Kept7963

joined 2 years ago
[–] Kept7963 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Say you have your display, this is made up of millions of lights that on their own just light up in whatever single colour you want, but together they light up to create an image.

Your software takes care of breaking down that image of a cat you want to look at into its corresponding pixels - with a value for colour and brightness.

For example it'll say this area in the cat's eye is black, so it'll request the no light to come out of it. Another area might be a pale red so it'll request red with some middle level of brightness.

Now your firmware takes that requested black for a specific Pixel and it'll physically cut power to switch off all the lights in the required area. For the pale red it'll power that the red ligh ON with hald power, whilst green and blue are OFF.

(things get more complex once you consider back-lightning)

[–] Kept7963 18 points 1 year ago (58 children)

Because of course people are always reasonable and back people and policies that are in their interest.

It seems like by and large there's support in Russia for the invasion in Ukraine. They might not be willing to go to full mobilisation, but if they don't have to die themselves they're fine with the invasion.

Do you propose that the Ukrainians should stop fighting and plead with the Russian people to overthrow Putin?

[–] Kept7963 9 points 1 year ago

There's not that much choice there, it genuinely takes 2-3 years to implement hardware that is radically different from what you're currently doing.

Because they're making millions upon millions of phones, they need to really nail the design before they start mass production. And that's neither cheap nor fast.

The big manufacturers can probably afford to do this faster, but the smaller ones might struggle so you need to make it fair.

By 'those privacy laws' do you mean GDPR? Because that's caused Threads not to be released in the EU, and you'll notice that all your devices now have USB C. These regulations have had a pretty significant impact.

[–] Kept7963 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The interesting part is that McLaren were fast in the corners, so that's a good sign for Hungary.

[–] Kept7963 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We went through this back in the day on r/Formula1, banning spoilers restricts the conversation.

I get that sometimes you're not able to watch live, restrict the Formula1 content you consume during that time.

You can't have the entire F1 community tiptoe around you because you've not watched the race.

Having said that, other race series should be spoiler-free in this community.

[–] Kept7963 1 points 1 year ago

Aren't we infantilising F1 drivers then? "If we don't put something physically in their way they won't obey the rules".

Other series have figured it out - MotoGP paints off-limits areas green and they put sensors on the edge. You get too many infringements you get a long lap penalty which costs you a few seconds.

I think this race worked well and they need to do the same at future races, and build consistency. Then people will learn not to take liberties.

If the enforcement overhead is too big, add a fine to the penalty as well: you cross off the track, you get €500 fine as well. Then use that to pay for extra stewards (or set up an automated system).

[–] Kept7963 2 points 2 years ago

That's a non-starter if you want to host motorcycle racing at that track.

Personally I welcome the new track limits rules, you step out of line you pay for it.

These are the best drivers in the world, surely they have enough control to make sure they don't get a penalty.

Some of them managed, others not so much.

[–] Kept7963 1 points 2 years ago

Holy cow that's utter insanity.

The UEFA Champions League Final (the biggest game in European Football, which is a far bigger event than even the Superbowl) had tickets starting from €70 (the tickets you actually wanted were €180 but you even the cheap tickets were perfectly fine).

Don't get me wrong, the sport is rinsing its fans as well but at least those ticket prices are still somewhat sane.

[–] Kept7963 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Actually, it looks like this time it might be true.

Source

Next is speculation on my part, but I imagine people are turning conservative more based on their wealth than their age. We saw a correlation between age and conservative sentiment because people tended to gather wealth as they got older.

But that link has been progressively eroded, so people are no longer switching. Essentially the conservatives are killing the golden goose in their incessant pursuit of consolidating wealth.

[–] Kept7963 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The hype around it is pretty insufferable though, in a way neither of the other examples you gave had.

The closest example I can think of is NFTs.

I don't think it'll go the way of NFTs, but it's also going to disappoint people because it's promising to be everything for everyone.

As far as I'm concern it's a very powerful search assistant and especially for bridging the gap between regular and power users - being able to use natural language is a game changer.

I also found it great when getting set up with a new piece of SW, and rephrasing or summarising text on general topics. It's not so good for parsing specialist information even when asked for specific items.

I'm looking forward to seeing what other tools people build with it but thus far I've been thoroughly... whelmed.

[–] Kept7963 18 points 2 years ago

So? You have a narrow use case that has nothing to do with what's being discussed here. Every time SUVs clogging cities is discussed you people come out "but how will I run my farm".

People running farms or similar businesses have been using pick-ups and other utility vehicles since times immemorial. I don't know if you're lying about the farm or not, frankly it doesn't matter, it shouldn't be any of your business whether or not suburbia is using massive trucks to ferry their kids to and from school.

Actually they're actively hurting you. Because manufacturers now target people who won't ever use them as utility vehicles, you can no longer buy basic cheap reliable pick-ups. They're all swollen with plastic bodywork that won't hold up to farm work, all the pointless faff inside is adding weight that's actively hurting your fuel efficiency whilst again making it less rugged.

The target audience is now an urban/suburban dweller who will lease it for three years and swap for a newer one, so everything is now less repairable when something goes wrong 6 months after the warranty runs out.

Plus now you're paying a luxury tax.

Really I fail to see how your life has been improved by the SUV invasion into cities.

Personally I think you're disingenuous and making a strawman argument because you like your lifted truck that's never seen mud.

[–] Kept7963 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Okay, so far successfully exiled to Belarus.

What's the next step?

view more: next ›