Karmmah

Lemmy.world is not frowned upon. There are some people who are very vocal about not liking it but if you don't have any problems you don't need to change. There is also nothing stopping you from having accounts on diferent instances so try some of them out and stay where you like it.

Christian Lealahabumrung

Das ist doch garantiert ein Fakename für irgendwas anderes.

The point of the fediverse is to give people the option to create communities by themselves and not be subject to the ruling of one central allmighty entity. If someone does not like one community they have the chance to create their own with their own rules. This means people can decide for themselves what content they want in their community. However people coming from traditional social media seem to mistake this kind of freedom with not needing to follow any rules but that's not how it works.

Honestly the last time Trump was president I think it was similar on reddit and in the media in general. It's just that news about the stupid stuff he does seem to generate a lot of engagement and that's what platforms and news organisations are looking for.

So how old is he? If all of you got children at 18 he could only be 82 if my calculation is correct.

What kind of problems did you experience? I'm on an admittedly flatpak first distro and I can't remember ever having issues.

Or just humanity in its entirety.

https://lemmy.world/c/potatoism

What do you classify as free speech?

Now that you've mentioned Obisian I realised that systems like it are quite different from how most things work. I use it myself and really like it, however it also takes quite some effort to get the best out of it. You have to actively create useful links between things and think about different ways you would want to access the content to be able to actually find it when you need it. For example you need to create aliases for elements if they are known by a different name in another context.

I think familiarity is a big part of why things catch on. If something is too different to what people know there will be only a few people who want spend their time learning it. And it would have to be revolutionary for these people to be able to convince others to also learn it.

It would have been helpful if in the video they would have discussed how an alternative could have even looked like and why it would be better. This is a demo of Project Xanadu, the system Ted Nelson envisions where he shows how it could work. He seems to propose that it would be hyper interconnected for every user of the system and every piece of media in it (another interview where he describes it). I'm not sure something like this could reliably work at a scale similar to the internet (he claims his system could have been the internet had they delivered it earlier) and also I'm not sure how it would work for what people actually want to do with the internet in addition to reading documents. Companies also want a certain control over the work they publish so I don't think they would like a system that connects their work to everything else. And you also have to keep in mind that there are people who want to actively do bad things so I am not sure how a hyper interconnected system could protect its users from bad actors.

Edit: Found another video where he describes and shows a version of how a document with paid content works. It looks interesting but I'm still not sure how this would work on the scale of the internet and if it would even be better than how things work right now.

Here is one of his presentations where he tells the entire story. I really recommend listening to the entire presentation, tough. He has amazing stories to tell and especially about how he himself took most of the amazing pictures of the SR-71.