Jomega

Are you legitimately suggesting 99.9% of obese people are overweight because it's fun for them? Because that's what you just said.

It's not the 90's anymore. You can play the new Mortal Kombat on the Switch, gore fully intact.

That's a nice argument, Senator. Why don't you back it up with a source?

"I wish to switch bodies with my master."

"I wish they could no longer talk."

So tech outpaces legislation, as it is wont to do since legislation is notoriously slow, and so because of that our reaction should be to throw our hands up and not even try? Perhaps you don't sympathize as much as you think you do.

I looked it up and you're right. I must of been thinking of a different crime. That'll teach me to go spouting off about stuff.

My point that AI is programmed to recycle and humans aren't is still something I stand by, so I edited my comment.

You're comparing something humans often do subconsciously to a machine that was programmed to do that. Unless you're arguing that intent doesn't matter ~~(pretty much every judge in America will tell you it does)~~ then we're talking about 2 completely different things.

Edit: Disregard the struck out portion of my comment. Apparently I don't know shit about law. My point is that comparing a a quirk of human psychology to the strict programming of a machine is a false equivalency.

I spent lots of hours interacting with it, and I understand its limitations and strengths.

Considering you think it's a substitute for a scholarly source, I doubt that. Once again, this is a machine designed to repeat things it heard. It's a mechanical parrot. ChatGPT4 did not earn a degree. It did not study. It does not fact check. It does not give a solitary fuck about the scientific method. If you cannot see why this would be a problem for its credibility, then I can't help you.

The rest of it

You just tried to use a glorified markov chain in an argument. Suffice to say I do not believe that you are the best judge of factual accuracy in regards to said tally.

In the short term, yes. What this leaves out is that two years of HRT is enough to negate those physical benefits. Hormones are powerful shit.

Also, no it fucking isn't a reasonable method. It has neither the credentials to know what it's talking about, nor any obligation to verify that what it says is true. Imagine reading 10,000 shitty sci-fi novels and 1 textbook and thinking you can piece together advanced physics. It literally cannot tell the difference between fact and fiction, nor does it care. It's a machine. Garbage in, garbage out.

Imagine using predictive text as a source.