Baldur's Gate 3 has no dlc at all. It has no dlc even announced, let alone available for purchase. Stop making shit up lol. Their launcher has info about the different games they've made and their prices, but when you actually launch the game it has NO ad of any sort. You could only barely call the info in their launcher an ad in the first place.
HandBreadedTools
joined 1 year ago
Holy shit your reality is as fucked up as a qanoners. Genuinely impressive, the mental hurdles on display here.
That's a homebrewed feat. Please know dandwiki mixes homebrew together with official material without disclosing which is which. If you want a superior alternative, I suggest either 5e.tools or dnd5e.wikidot.
Just kidding this is an official 3.5e feat lol my bad. The point remains about dandwiki though.
Bro do you know how power storage works
You realize that was a simulation right? It says so in the very top of the article. It was an exercise, military training for everyone involved.
No, Sweden did not sink a US Aircraft Carrier lmfao.
Wikipedia lists 17 different references from the last 70 years on this topic. It is not a new concept. It is also literally evident in a variety of places that have tried the absolute free speech approach, such as 4chan.
Your entire comment is either disingenuous or asinine.
Bro who asked
Your comment demonstrates a gross amount of ignorance of how the American Government functions.
That "flaw" you pointed out is the point of the infographic. It is literally just to visualize the proportion of revenue paid to employees. No one is saying that the rest of the revenue is straight up profit, I cannot even imagine how you came to that conclusion.
The revenue vs profit aspect is also difficult to measure. An example as to why is Amazon claimed it made no profit for years, because it reinvested all of the revenue it gained in addition to revenue that paid for operating costs. Are you going to believe Amazon's claim? Most people would argue they did profit, and that reinvestment is still profiting, but that's not how things are often measured.
I hope you understand why you're being downvoted. Please look into the issue further before making wildly inaccurate claims that you try to back up with common sense arguments.
This is the most incoherent paragraph I've read on this platform to date.
You're just wrong lol. Asking someone why they don't smile more is fucking patronizing. Asking why someone looks angry all the time is about asking to learn more about them, as they have genuine interest in the person.
Do you honestly think a woman would ask a man why they look angry all the time if they genuinely believed the man was simply angry?