This paper basically debunks everything she said in her shitty video since productivity mostly equals technological advancement, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22002169
You can always just say it is a study of revolutionary artistic style. The thing to be concerned about is mixing your real world pieces, that you would put in a portfolio, and the ones you publish under a pseudonym.
I think the AI is going out on a limb a bit. The features in the output are just a bit off, it doesn't look like him anymore. Noseridge, eye spacing, hairline, cheekbone pronounciation, eyebrow spacing, mouthprofile, it's kind of interesting how the normalized output reshapes the original.
In Sweden it is cast as a Russian/Wagner takeover snce we're unable to comprehend anything outside of an colonial framework, instead of a struggle for self determination. That being said any counter narrative is portrayed as pro Russian propaganda being spread on pro Russian social media. Nothing is said about the French colonial bullshit, the unfair and exremely exploitative extraction of natural reaources, or even any attempt to correctly historically contextualize the "coup".
Dont worry about me comrade, I have been active in the real world since the 90s
Communism will win!
Next stop, Bob Igers villa
Ah yes, screwdriver, the well renowned anti fascist tankie band
I'm 100% high of my basyness
I thought he hated country to? I was under the impression he funded squaredancing since country music was to socialists, which successfully undermined that cultural movement.
Who must go?!?? This made my day :) The curse lives on!