That exists, it's called a face tattoo.
Fisk400
joined 2 years ago
Natural resources it the prime example. I think all natural resources should exclusively be under democratic control and all profits from the sale of naturals resources goes exclusively to the government. Developed land like private housing gets complicated fast but ideally things should work like things work now but the government fulfills the functions of a landlord.
Popular vote is what the most number of people want. The idea that popular vote is bad is anti-democratic.
Nobody should be allowed to own land. You can build a building and that building is yours because you built it but you can't make land and the only reason you own it is because someone in the past used violence to take it.
I think the gist of it is that it alters the heart rhythm rather than starting and stopping it.
All NFTs are scams and if you think any of it isn't a scam it's because you are getting scammed by that particular variant.
They are not giving such license and even if they did, it's a completely different system that is called copyright law. We had that way before NFTs existed. The NFTs part of the system has absolutely nothing to do with the image and copyright management.
People think that because it's the only way the whole thing isn't a stupid waste of time and resources.
Also it isn't bad art but it is art that is indistinguishable from any highschooler that likes to draw.
NFTs does not let you own images. The weird monkey company still owns all the monkeys. You own a piece of code that you can trade and monkey company pinky swears to keep a database where each piece of code has one unique monkey.
Should the monkey company ever want to go back on that promise they can just have 2 codes have the same image with no legal consequences.
I don't think we should take our lessons from a third world country.
Arguably that would make it even more effective.