I have to do prior auths sometimes. Always get this line which makes me think what the fuck am I doing this for?
“Prior authorization is not a guarantee of payment. All final payment is subject to the members eligibility and benefits at the time of service”.
I wouldn’t be so certain.
No need to make the internet a worse place.
More Reddit-y here by the day…
Not a gun owner myself, so curious, is your carry gun not always locked up when not on your person?
Except a pardon is a core function within the president’s constitutional authority, not just an official act, thus based on the opinion entitled to absolute immunity. The footnote exchange is only referencing official acts (which are entitled to presumptive immunity) not core constitutional functions (like a pardon).
I have a different take and I think the Chief Justice is being intentionally vague here. He references a bribery prosecution but never specifically mentions in the footnote whether he is referring to the issuance of a pardon, which is a core function, and thus entitled to absolute immunity based on the rest of the opinion. It’s also not clear whether he is referring to a prosecution of the briber or the person being bribed.
(on standing)
The irony here, is this is the kind of vague and obtuse fuckery online casinos and sportsbooks pull with their customers all the time.
You go, no you go, no you go, you go, no you go
Pretty cool glasses though
Is unequivocally content neutral to initiate a new place restriction before any content is expressed in that place. If they subsequently allow other protests in that place, but continue to restrict Gaza protests in that place, then it is not content neutral.
Your second question is either disingenuous or involved zero actual effort on your end, or both. Obviously this is an emotional subject, but it doesn’t absolve from using critical thinking.
I’m not sure it’s helpful to continue, take care.
More likely he’s using meth.