Evia

https://www.ravelry.com/patterns/library/twilight-21

Something like this but make it longer, do a knot hood and find a simple colourwork pattern?

https://www.ravelry.com/patterns/library/paper-houses

Or this, with a hood and in black and white?

It depends how comfortable you are modifying patterns, I guess pp

The reason I never made socks is because I hated how the heel flap looked and was too intimidated by all of the others. Bit the bullet and decided to try with FLK and never gone back. I think that the instructions are a little overexplained but, overall, it's a very easy and rhymic pattern.

I've started experimenting with the ratio of side heel:centre heel:side heel and have found that I prefer the heel to be ⅔ of the total circumference, so you might want to try a few alterations once you're familiar with it.

Thanks, that's the one I've seen recommended the most, I reckon

Maybe this weekend I'll give it a go on the old laptop

Even as someone relatively comfortable with computers, Linux intimidates me. I want to use it but there're so many variations and it's a massive rabbit hole to go down; I just don't have the time or energy to spend several days getting it set up how I want it and fixing any errors that I cause

And if you throw up, don't brush your teeth as you're then just scrubbing stomach acid into them. Rinse and gargle with water then brush an hour later

Either or both parent could be responsible depending on the circumstances. Was dad working away and doesn't own any guns? Not his responsibility. Does mum have 3 guns but all of them were locked away according to strict safety regulations and the child accessed a gun from somewhere else? Also not responsible. Did uncle give the child a gun and tell him to go nuts? Very responsible. Circumstances, and levels of culpability, can vary. If both parents own guns, didn't secure them properly and failed to monitor or restrict the child's concerning behaviours then yes, they're both equally culpable.

I don't really identify as liberal and not sure what that's got to do with anything. But regardless, if somebody's willful negligence leads to multiple deaths then yes, they should be held accountable.

I have a sick (but not dying) sister with 3 kids. As far as work are concerned, I visit every fortnight to help out and rush up to see them every time there's an emergency or they need childcare.

I haven't seen the sister in four years and only see my nephews twice a year when they visit Grandma but work don't need to know that

We don't need to focus on the details here. If they were strangers, the jury would say something to the effect of, 'Jennifer failed to prevent undue access to her gun' or 'negligently permitted a stranger to have access to her gun'. Ultimately, if it's her gun, she needs to be in control of it, regardless of the circumstances

Eh, if the child was an adult and they were strangers to each other, I'd still say that the gun owner was culpable for not securing their gun properly. If you own a weapon, it's your responsibility to know where it is and what it's doing at any time

More than one person can be responsible for a crime. A burgler might have been the one to break and enter but the accomplice could still have been culpable of staking the house and driving the getaway car.

Use a different coloured pen and write with your left to disguise the handwriting was my trick