I fear you're probably correct in how it will play out. Popular culture stuff has been in a vicious cycle of ping-ponging between reactionary extremes for a while now.
That said, I agree with you, it's somewhere between 1 and 2, but I think 1 was carried by breaking the norm at the time, so the humor can't have the same impact it did then due to it being expected now and other franchises jumping on similar humor since.
I've been thinking about this more recently after trying to get my partner into BL2 after she saw my friends and I playing through 3. She lasted about an hour and a half into BL2 before she wasn't interested, and in all fairness? It was the same for myself and my friends who'd spent 500+ hours in it previously. Even scooter's nonsense was failing to get any giggles out.
The concensus on 3 is largely on point, but somewhere along the line people decided Jack was a great villain and BL2 was incredible. I can't say I agree, in spite of having a blast when it came out but I think it's fair to credit that to playing with friends. It was just such a huge expansion from BL1s flat story and pushed further with abandoning the brown syndrome BL1 just barely sidestepped. Jack is currently being viewed with rose-tinted lenses, he was always annoying (just not as grating or recently experienced as the Twins) and the humor really does fall flat more than it doesn't.
I'd say you're right that it is a time capsule, and it's not without its charms, as you said, but people are on the bandwagon puffing it up due to nostalgia, frustrations with BL3 (and the movie), and these articles talking about wanting to cut down on the toilet humor.
Edgy won't do it, they need to figure out how to be cleverly dumb rather than in your face aggressively dumb which the Twins and Jack both did.
From the looks of things, 20 minutes into the future.
Nobody wants West or Stein except for Putin lol
Basic alt girls with floral/bird tattoos who think making soup was alien enough to be considered magicks love BG3 and DnD. Now their orbiting nerds have accepted their new definition to not be cast out.
It's another personality substitute after the tattoos, hair dye, and Lovecraft obsessions stopped feeling edgy.
Yea. I can't actually recall the icons before the rebranding.
Yea, it's abstracted but based on aperture blades of the shutter.
That's not entirely true, everyone knows boebert is also a whore in the sexual manner too.
In group/out group dynamics are fueled by insecurity and ignorance. Reddit (the internet/humanity) is full of people who are scared of being outcasts and do not know themselves well enough to be confident. Often for good reason because there are swathes of people who will punish them for not going along with the group. The punishments are almost always disproportionate to the transgression, and continually escalate as the in-group feels completely justified in their actions due to confirmation bias.
In the case of reddit's main demographic these are young, typically nerdy men who have experienced being outcasts, and not a whole lot else - who now relish the thought of finally being part of the in-group. They will go far out of their way to prove they belong, even if it means handling themselves in a hypocritical manner and giving up their unique interests to mirror the majority of the group. Those who do not either leave, get labeled as contrarian (and summarily dismissed) or actually go fully contrarian (not like the other girls~~)
The entirety of modern social media being built around Trends™ is all you need to see how weak people's identities really are. It's part of why people who are authentically themselves (Trump, Walz) are viewed as strong depending on which side of the divide you fall on. People are so busy faking it to fit in (in fear of real consequences), they've outsourced their entire being to the trends of the group they mostly identify with.
It's fully baked in to small town American identity, and even those who can see how absurd it is will still be forced to choose between unjustified torment, conformity, or leaving. One of those options is safe, the other two are risky or outright dangerous. All three options reinforce the belief of the in-group that their choice is the way it's meant to be.
In short: people are really weak and we live in a culture that has preyed on this for centuries under the threat of violence.
You are quite naive.
Not even talking about corporations, just everyone with a house to sell. Their expectations are going to remain the same plus 25k with this. It will be like that 25k never existed as it passes from government to seller making no impact on actual costs to the buyer.
This a detail I haven't seen many others pick up on. The guy hyped himself up on doing it, then went for it with gusto.