But why? Why would Russia invade again in a few years? What's the logic behind that? Just "putler bad", "russia bad". Or is there any actual reasoning on why?
Thanks. Now I feel even worse about my height.
Two things:
A) Education not telling people about the 1930s famine beyond holodomor.
B) The tried and true method for liberals: not reading a book.
ImageMap is crashing the server again (I think). So this time it's gone for good.
The mango press article was available up until at least June of this year. It was retrieved last year. This shouldn't be news to you. You clearly show knowledge of archive.org by using it, so I don't understand why you have to point that out, when you can check if it was available and now isn't?
The CBS news article is a recounting of one person telling their story of Tianamen. It links, for whatever reason, to another different persons telling of their story.
It really is. At some point I memorized the entire song, too bad I don't speak Russian, so I'm probably absolutely butchering it every time I try to sing it.
Imagemap is crashing again?
It crashed, but restarted immediately.
Are they biased in some way
Yes. All news/media sources are biased. There is no such thing as unbiased news.
This is the problem with "tankie", nobody can actually define it.
You, attempting to refute that it's "woke" but for liberals, proved that it is "woke" for liberals.
Then... they failed? You're saying that if they win, they fail. Or at least, they can't win hard enough to actually get what they want.
You're also assuming Russia wants territory. If Russia wanted, say, Ukraine not being admitted to NATO, and they can get a peace that ensures that, then there isn't a reason for them to invade again. Or if Russia wanted UKR to stop shelling the eastern regions, then annexing just them might stop that, in which case, they don't have any reason to invade again.