CodingAndCoffee

joined 1 year ago
[–] CodingAndCoffee 4 points 1 year ago

Give a random user the conch. Let chaos prevail

[–] CodingAndCoffee 12 points 1 year ago

Very generally, it's advised to have a minimum of 3 years "clean" accounting books before an IPO. I believe that means taking no additional capital, no rescues, etc. Just what the company can earn with what it has.

Losing mods and power users, plus losing advertisers, probably caused a few hiccups in their bottom line this year.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 69 points 1 year ago (15 children)

You sound like a good person who returns their shopping cart

[–] CodingAndCoffee 2 points 1 year ago

Is is a deposit, or a down payment 🤔

[–] CodingAndCoffee 4 points 1 year ago

I've been working out 2 hours a day and started playing daily sudoku and lichess puzzles

[–] CodingAndCoffee 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My mom's gonna be so mad her propaganda Trump memes are gone

[–] CodingAndCoffee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're congested, put 12 drops of the spiciest hot sauce you can get in a small cup of water and gargle it and swish it around like mouthwash.

You won't enjoy it, but you will be able to breathe.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 1 points 1 year ago

I can confirm for you that northern California is nicer

[–] CodingAndCoffee 15 points 1 year ago

You visited the worst parts. No wonder.

Try Yosemite, Oakhurst, Morro Bay, or Monterey.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've thought about this a little bit but again my math isn't so strong.

I guess approaching this more from computer science (something I'm more familiar with) you could compare with stuff like the NP Hard class of problems. And thus I offer that unproveable does not mean "wrong". We generally "know" that P=NP is wrong but we cannot prove it only because we lack omniscience. Us lacking the information (in the physics sense of the word i.e. Hawking radiation) doesn't mean the information isn't there to be quantified.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, when writing this I sort of had the notion that any argument against hard determinism using quantum mechanics would instead 1) actually prove multiverse theory, and 2) therefore still prove in favor of determinism.

[–] CodingAndCoffee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe? My layman understanding of that topic is that the act of observation collapses alternative waveforms down to a single observed state. And if that's the case, why couldn't you "observe" the whole brain?

view more: ‹ prev next ›