Wow. It's been a long time since I've heard that one.
ClanOfTheOcho
joined 1 year ago
- Werther's Original. It's a candy.
I mentioned the not reading the article so people would not waste their time citing facts from the article that may explain the headline that suggested billions social security numbers were leaked. I made no assumptions about missing addresses, as the headline didn't mention anything about missing addresses. I even mentioned that the event the article discussed was probably pretty bad -- definitely not a negative against the article's believability. I'm only guilty of judging a book by its cover, and in an existence of limited time, nobody has time to do any more than that except for limited exceptions. I did not choose to make this article an exception. The headline was mathematically deceptive, and my comment was about that. Nothing more.
If you see an article highlighting a breach of social security numbers and don't assume it's about the U.S., that's crazy to me.
I was thinking it is almost its own form of stolen valor, but I'm not a vet, so my opinions remain just that.
Edit: "it" being to denigrate Waltz's honorable and valued service, in case that wasn't clear
Like I said, I didn't read the article, but only Americans would have social security numbers.
It sounds like a bad breach, and I'm not arguing against that. I just want to point out my doubts that there were ever 2.9 billion Americans since the founding of the nation, let alone since social security numbers became a thing. Maybe if I bothered to read the article, it would make more sense.
But totally not stranded... -NASA, probably
On top of the other comments, it's a play on the Obama "Hope" poster.
Elon is looking a smidge undead in this photo.
Attack the judges, jury, and executioners? Bold strategy, Cotton.
Boneheads. They initiated an entirely unnecessary conflict. They didn't see this as a possibility?