Chipthemonk

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The responded article says this:

A total of 6 studies were included, involving 4 countries, after a total of 5,178 eligible articles were searched in databases and references.

They literally typed some shit into the journal search database that had that many articles. They didn’t study all of those articles. Their study is founded exclusively from 6 studies. The Cochrane review’s approach is far more comprehensive and goes into considerably more depth in many more studies.

So, maybe you didn’t read the articles? Or maybe you don’t understand population level, public health study methods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, they aren’t confident. Isn’t it amazing that that is their results after 2 fucking years and a ton of studies into it? You’d think they could come up with more conclusive evidence that masks work. But they didn’t. The science on masks isn’t resolved. That’s pretty damning in my view.

Surgical masks don’t do shit. They only protect larger particles. Virus shit is far too small for any effectiveness.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Look at the date you dumb fuck. Then recognize that the Cochrane review is highly respected when it comes to public health science.

You people are ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t realize Lemmy was such a cesspool when it came to a love for dystopian Covid shit. There are some strange people here.

view more: next ›