ChewTiger

joined 2 years ago
[–] ChewTiger 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ChewTiger 14 points 1 year ago

Cats should be kept inside. They are too destructive to other local wildlife. Also people can manage to keep a pet properly exercised, entertained, and happy in an apartment.

[–] ChewTiger 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Would definitely be a step in the right direction. I'd even be ok with exceptions for the tiny churches in small towns.

[–] ChewTiger 14 points 2 years ago (12 children)

IDK, if we're comparing scourges against humanity I'd say "the rich" in general are worse, be they kings, CEOs, religious icons, politicians, or whatever. Their pursuit of money and the power to keep that money corrupts everything. They ruin everything from companies to countries and even religions (makes them even worse).

Really though, the most evil thing is cancer. It kills indiscriminately and tortures its victims the whole way. Even if you win, you never get the peace of knowing it's truly gone. True evil.

[–] ChewTiger 7 points 2 years ago

Not sure which I like more. I think I'll use both.

[–] ChewTiger 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I know hardware compatibility has massively improved, but back when I was messing with Linux in high school compatibility was a huge issue. I managed to end up with two laptops and some desktop hardware that were truly difficult to get running. It's like I somehow found a list of incompatible hardware and chose the worst options.

The most frustrating were an evil Broadcom (I think) wireless card and an AMD switchable card (they did actually make a few). That graphics card wasn't supported for very long and was a bother even in Windows.

Edit to add: I was just saying that to point out why some people might have that opinion, even if it isn't valid anymore. I'm actually thinking of jumping back on the Linux bandwagon.

[–] ChewTiger 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can they drag a few others down with them?

[–] ChewTiger 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe they don't get along, or they use magic in entirely different and incompatible ways.

[–] ChewTiger 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even with those limitations, duplication would still allow food producers to make less food go a longer way. Smaller farms could feed more people, reducing pollution. You could duplicate the food at the point of sale, which would drastically reduce transportation costs as well as traffic. Hell, cities could have small farms and fed themselves. It would also drastically reduce water consumption that is used in farming, reducing droughts. Producing and transporting food is a massive contributor to global warming. Farms and ranches take up tons of space, all that land could be returned to its natural state (I bet wizards could speed that up).

If wizards showed up with the cure to cancer and fed the hungry they'd easily have 1/5 of the world's population on their side. Unfortunately the wizarding society is extremely exploitative of animals, even worse than the average muggle.

I get that wizards were persecuted and don't want to have muggles expect them to solve all their problems, but they could literally save the planet.

[–] ChewTiger 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's still slavery and slavery is bad in any context.

[–] ChewTiger 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Competition is good, especially with regards to privacy and cyber security. Customers benefit when companies don't have a captured market. A lack of competition only leads to monopolies and stagnation.

If no one offers a secure product, then customers have no choice but to either not use anything or put up with it. Competition means that at any time a newcomer can offer a better product (that is hopefully open source).

Edit to add: Ideally you could message people on different apps with the same account. But I'll take fragmentation over a monopoly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›