BrainInABox

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It really doesn't

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (6 children)

You first. Please present your empirical evidence from completely unbiased sources for your claims:

Because sensationalism creates ad revenue.

and

So the news you receive from any side of any story is going to try and make you as angry/scared as possible so you’re more apt to share it and spread the word

and

they then use the page bits and time spent on their sites to generate more ad revenue.

and

tankie, far-left, liberal, democratic, conservative, republican, and MAGA-affiliated sites. They’re guaranteed to not be honest with you

and

stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

(Here present empirical evidence from unbiased source for the claim that these networks are independent, for the claim they're unbiased, and for the claim that you should stick with them).

Go on, practice what you preach, don't just be a bad faith hypocrite who's bigmad that his own personal bias isn't unquestionably accepted as gospel truth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

a president for life

Western liberals try not to arrogantly talk on subjects they are objectively incorrect about challenge (impossible)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

unbiased sources

Lol. So not Reuters or AP then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Average liberal when presented with facts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Because money can buy newspapers, tv stations, social networks, think tanks, marketing companies, and legislation.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Anyone still trying to say AP and Reuters are independent and unbiased after the way they've covered Israel's genocide is just revealing their own extreme ideological bias.

Also, the whole concept of saying to avoid liberal sources and then pointing to liberal sources while saying that they're "unbiased" (as if bias free sources are even possible) is a peak example of fish not knowing what water is.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because the slow decay of the capitalist order that has been occurring since the neoliberal turn has reached the point where it's effects are being felt in the global North

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"Those stupid progressives! Why do they not simply have hyperwealthy oligarchs back their movements!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Who upvoted this edgy highschool crap?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope you understand that you are off the deep end into conspiracy land to the same degree as Qanon types.

view more: ‹ prev next ›