BilliamBoberts

joined 10 months ago
[–] BilliamBoberts 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You hit the nail on the head, the issue with communism is not freeloarders or lack of incentives, it's the fact that any form of hierarchy will create a power imbalance, and there will always be people who try to take advantage of it to better themselves and their friends at the expense of everyone else.

[–] BilliamBoberts 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even at a global scale? How would communism produce enough resources to sustain the human race while doing so ethically when at the same time removing all incentives by providing free food, shelter, clothing, entertainment, and everything else for free?

[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That concerns me because that creates a conflict of interest if the only people who can invite or remove people from the council are other members of said council. We see in the real world that breeds nepotism and corruption and makes non-violent policy change nearly impossible. Wouldn't it be better to allow the people to choose council members and remove them by vote when necessary?

[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Would that require unlimited resources and automation to guarantee that level of productivity ethically?

[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Who chooses when and why a leader will be removed?

[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Who distributes these vouchers, and how? If everyone gets everything for free, what use are these vouchers?

[–] BilliamBoberts 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Under that system, all leadership would be exclusive and homogeneous, as they would all be a part of some select leadership class, not unlike the nobility class of europe. Picking people from childhood and grooming them to be leaders is no guarantee that they will be good leaders. What do we do if someone is a bad leader in this sytem?

[–] BilliamBoberts 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

You have to put someone in charge of distributing the goods and services, set laws to make interactions between parties fair, and divy up resources, and remove/rehabilitate criminals, and that inherently creates a power imbalance. How do you suggest we keep the leaders beholden to the governed in this system so they dont abuse this power?

[–] BilliamBoberts 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

So labor vouchers are money that give special treatment to people who do undesirable tasks? Or are they forced upon people at random, like a temporary forced labor lottery?

[–] BilliamBoberts 4 points 9 months ago (18 children)

If you abolish the monetary system, how do people acquire goods and services and get compensated for their labor?

[–] BilliamBoberts 3 points 10 months ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›