AnarchistsForKamala

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] AnarchistsForKamala 6 points 2 months ago

that's what this post is, but it's not what caused the ban

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

having multiple fediverse accounts is not bannable, and ad hominem is itself bad faith. calling it out is not.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 4 points 2 months ago

they said fight, not hope

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 35 points 2 months ago (7 children)

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 5 points 2 months ago

if the first one is true then the second explanation is moot

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 2 points 3 months ago

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 1 points 3 months ago

let me know when they work

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 0 points 3 months ago

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 1 points 3 months ago

they seem authoritative.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala 1 points 3 months ago

a lack of evidence to the contrary is not evidence in the positive.

 
 
 

unburdened by what has been

view more: next ›