It’s the reverse. Companies get in trouble for agreeing to not poach employees from each other.
5BC2E7
joined 2 years ago
you must be pretty dense if you expect me to respond after I said I'll not comment further.
they obviously mean their financial security.
unfortunately too many people use that label for anyone that doesn't agree with their opinions. it's unfortunate because fascism is a real concern so we should not dillute the term.
I think that the major issue is that they were paying a one time fee for whatever rights they claimed about the biometrics. They should be paying monthly fees instead.
Separately, a journalist from Italy who spoke to The Times of Israel on condition of anonymity recounted that in 2009, right after Israel’s Operation Cast Lead against Hamas, he visited Gaza’s hospitals looking to interview wounded members of Fatah — the rival Palestinian faction that Hamas violently ousted from the coastal enclave in 2007.
“Eventually, I realized that they were all at home — Fatah members were too afraid to stay in the hospital, even if they were wounded,” the journalist said.
“Shifa is a very large compound. I got lost inside it, and at some point I ended up on an underground floor, and I found myself in front of two armed Hamas men in military attire, who told me to get out.”
Then perhaps they should start with batteries if the problem is loss of power
edit: i guess people care more about increasing the use of solar power than the lives that could be saved with additional batteries in more hospitals with the same investment.
Not just the entire family. She alleged that even her therapist was against her.
I propose he takes the migrants instead.
As a counter example there are fields like machine learning where there is a lot of “capitalist” innovation