3laws

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] 3laws 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Albert Einstein. He was as misogynistic as you can w/o committing any crime.

[–] 3laws 2 points 1 year ago

I don't see Variety as the pinacle of journalism whatsoever.

[–] 3laws 1 points 1 year ago
[–] 3laws 1 points 1 year ago

You think this is acceptable

Yes.

until an ad put it's close button up there and Chrome has already prevented AdBlock.

No.

[–] 3laws 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

make you

That's a very bold and not entirely true statement. But alright, have at it.

[–] 3laws 3 points 1 year ago

Show me in this doll where the Arch user hurt you. 😞

[–] 3laws -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So if I do, then what? What's your next argument?

[–] 3laws 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, they are big enough and have tabs and famous enough people that they can bribe some C list politicians/judicial people to keep a low profile under the grand scheme of things, just as you said it.

[–] 3laws 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

No. It sucks because it's Chromium.

[–] 3laws 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

other than it looked good to whoever came up with it?

That's just objectively wrong. Biologically speaking.

We have pretty much since we are Sapiens preferred rounded everything. Boba and Kiki are a thing.

The oddity (biologically speaking) is finding sharp edges more appealing whee they offer no considerable advantage...

When browsing even the least reactive webpage EVER; you won't be needing those 32.5 missing pixels.

[–] 3laws 4 points 1 year ago

Structurally speaking, yes rounded corners are 2 magnitudes better against direct impacts. That's just physics.

[–] 3laws 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Contractually they can't fire you for refusing to give up your human rights. Yes, privacy is a human right.

view more: ‹ prev next ›