Conspiracy Theories

278 readers

1 users here now

This community is about both sharing your theories, and laughing at the stupid ones.

It is the place to discuss every aspect of conspiracy theorems, from theories and current events to debunking’s and popular culture.

#Community Guidelines:

1. No Bigotry: No content that supports racism, antisemitism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, ableism, or any other language that demeans protected or marginalized groups of people.

2. No Misinformation: While this is a space to explore and entertain theories, support for any misinformation currently causing public safety problems is not allowed.

3. No Personal Attacks: Threat of Violence, or Abusive Language. Personal attacks, threats of violence/abusive language in any form will not be tolerated.

4. No Sensationalized or Misleading Titles: Titles of links should accurately describe the content. Misleading or sensationalist headlines will be removed. For serious articles, the original headline is often the best choice

5. No Title Only Posts: All text posts require a descriptive body text. When submitting a text post, you should expand on the title in order to get the discussion started. For instance, when submitting a question you can expand on what motivated you to ask the question.

6. No Abuse of Capital Letters: If the title of your post or comment overly abuses capital letters then it will be removed by the moderators.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-5

Serious Conspiracy Theory: L•🔛 🦌 want this massive 🐥 dead and erased so (not techie) people would hardly/not get more and better news/information on Internet ever. (lemmyunchained.net)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I wonder that L•🔛 🦌 be gradually destroying this massive 🐥, one of the vast, fastest and easiest networks where people instantly flock all together to hear trending news, get more informed and connect to each other. If this falls down absolutely, real online people will hardly/not know where to go and gather better news/info, or people will eventually just get less or up to no news/info from the Internet ever especially amid serious events ~~indirectly on behalf of powerful people desiring to dispel the noise about their schemes and mischiefs~~.

(Despite misinformation on this platform and everywhere of course), There are official news press, actual journalists, company official pages, open public servants, active advocates, engaging celebrities, proper fandoms and figured people and ordinary people (who witness/experience those events) on this platform almost (good for official statements and contents straight directly from them). Without it, people(audience) will have to take more time and greater effort in further browsing "everywhere else" on Internet just to confirm an unverified info by the real people(source).

Hence, this is(?) why people are still visiting and keep always coming back to this automatically. But sadly based on many news and then continual criticisms I heard, so this platform is having deteriorated by the current administration with their disappointing decisions and recently frustrating implementations (should they be focusing on redefining misinformation, malbots and netiquettes for better configuring securities and protection instead.)

[Rewritten post. By sense of dislikes (tried to evaluate where bad) to relocation, Original post badly deleted without recovery. May be removed if disapproved otherwise.]

~Disclaimer:~ ~Never~ ~I~ ~have~ ~actual~ ~receipts~ ~admitting/showing~ ~that~ ~🦌~ ~be~ ~destroying~ ~the~ ~🐥.~ ~But~ ~reminder,~ just a "theory".

(Intention of this post: to have awareness of the value and thoughtful beneficence of social medias / social networking sites, as information disseminating tools.)

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

WTF?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are you trying to say that Twitter, represented by the "🐥" emoji, despite having issues with misinformation, plays a pivotal role in the global information landscape? You value its functionality as a swift and accessible platform where people from various backgrounds - including official news outlets, actual journalists, companies, public servants, advocates, celebrities, fandoms, and ordinary citizens - can share and receive information.

You express a concern that an entity symbolized by the "🦌" might be negatively impacting Twitter, which could potentially lead to its downfall. You worry about the consequences of such a scenario, as you believe that people might then struggle to find alternative reliable sources of news and information. They may also have to spend more time and effort verifying the authenticity of these sources.

In your view, the current administration of the platform has made disappointing decisions and implemented frustrating policies. Rather than these, you suggest that the administration should concentrate their efforts on addressing the misinformation problem, and on improving the security and protection mechanisms for the users of the platform.

Finally, you seem to be advocating for an increased recognition of the intrinsic value and benefits of social media and social networking sites. You emphasize their crucial role in information dissemination, and you desire that users become more aware of these platforms' significance in our digital age. Despite your critique, you remain attached to Twitter, as evidenced by the fact that people, including yourself, keep coming back to it. Does this adequately represent your thoughts?

I’m struggling to find the conspiracy theory, and why it’s posted in this community.