this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
18 points (90.9% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1247 readers
44 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Of note in this report is the suggestion that someone has spoken with the two Republicans opposing disclosure. And it’s hinted that they were warned that failure to support controlled disclosure would result in ‘catastrophic’ disclosure…which I take to mean, runaway disclosure.

My mind turns to something mentioned here a few months ago from Ross Coulthart: that a certain too-large-to-move crashed object, residing in a place outside US control might get revealed if progress is not made.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HM05_Me 1 points 11 months ago

They’re creating a Streisand effect by fighting this amendment. It does seem that the amendment was created knowing that the march to disclosure has already started and is meant to ensure it’s done smoothly. It could be as simple as knowing that too many whistleblowers have come forward and the government can’t prevent details of these programs from coming to light. In any case, the ball started rolling a while back and they seem to think there’s no stopping it.