this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

HiFi - For The Audio Connoisseur

464 readers
11 users here now

A place for those who enjoy high fidelity audio.

Rules

Be a decent human being

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey hey!

I’m window shopping for a DAC for a simple computer/desktop system. Mac Mini —> DAC —> Adam A5x.

Right now I’m using a Focusrite Scarlett Solo that I’m looking to upgrade for (A) improved sound quality - something smooth - speakers plenty detailed and unforgiving and (B) remote volume!

Any thoughts / suggestions under $800 new or used.

Teac UD 503 is my top choice at the moment.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MigratingtoLemmy 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah, so you're looking for high-end.

Unfortunately, I only really have impressions of Chi-fi, and for $800 I'd recommend the D90LE from Topping and the SMSL SU-10

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those are interesting choices, though my gut is that the Teac would be a better match for this system.

Also interested in the RME-ADI-2, but it’s more than I want to spend, but still considering it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you consider an integrated like kef LS50W /W2? I have gone this way years ago and really enjoying it. Simple setup, paired with any of many open source streaming platforms. Outstanding audio quality and you end up saving a lot. With the W2 you can even automate things (turn on the speaker and set the right input whenever the steamer goes in playback mode, etc)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those sound neat, but wouldn’t have been on my radar. My first serious speakers were KEFs - my parents have them now.

I have Oskar Hell Aulos for my main system. It’s the tweeters in these that led to the Adams.

Too much competition for my money these days or I would have probably already bought the Teac DAC. It’s interesting not many DACs have remote volume. It’s not a typical setup I get it.

load more comments
view more: next ›