this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
44 points (95.8% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
121 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I like to try websites out before tying my identity to them. How do you do it? Simplelogin? I honestly won't manually make a new gmail for every new website I try and I to want the option to see what emails I get.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I host my own Simplelogin instance and generate a new address for every service. Combined with Bitwarden, I now have a unique address and password combination for each account.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I.. did not know you could self host. Well that's neat.

[–] capital 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m still not clear on the value proposition of simplelogin.

I seem to get the same thing with a domain and a catch all address.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How do you reply to emails to your catch-all?

[–] capital 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Hit reply.

This is why I just moved from protonmail to Fastmail. With Fastmail I can send from arbitrary addresses using my domain. Why it’s not that simple with proton is beyond me and now that I’ve tested everything with Fastmail these past few weeks, I see it’s a choice.

I almost signed up for simplelogin but realized I was being sold something that should just be included. Plus setup was convoluted as fuck.

Meanwhile Fastmail is intuitive so far.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But in some cases you don’t want to use arbitrary addresses, but the exact same that was used to send you an e-mail. For me this is necessary and Simplelogin hides my real e-mail address. Additionally, I can with ease deactivate addresses and minimize spam by a lot.

[–] capital 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I can reply from ANY address from my domain including the exact one that was used to send me an email.

I can “deactivate addresses” by sending messages to a particular address straight to trash with rules.

Edit: turns out Fastmail has a masked addresses feature built in, separate from a catch-all. It’s basically simplelogin built in, if you want to enable it. Proton is looking more and more overpriced.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Which of those work for phone numbers (SMS validation)? Email is easy.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd never use a temp email when I'm paying, considering they have my CC info. For random accounts that I won't check the mail accounts of, temp is great. Not going to trust a company for this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

With gmail if you have an account like [email protected] you can then sign up for a website such as netflix with email [email protected] and gmail will forward it to [email protected], but you'll still see the full address on the To line so you'll know where the mail came from. Anything after the + can be whatever you want. This lets you sign up with a different email address for every site you visit without having to create new addresses with gmail. You can also make a filter to hide spam if one of the addresses is compromised.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

only works with very simple scripts though - I'd assume that checking for a '+' in front of the '@' and removing everything inbetween is very simple if your goal is to spam everyone from a data-leak

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That's very true. I cannot attest to the knowledge and skills of potential spammers. However, more common than data leaks are data selling, and I doubt any company would bother to manipulate the email addresses they buy from others.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I feel like numbers are much more difficult, aren't they? There are limits to how many there are, and the generally cost money to register. How does generating a unique number per service per user work?