this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)

Arch Linux

7175 readers
1 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm back to GNOME after years away. What extensions do you use that's compatible with the version of GNOME that's in the Arch repo?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm on Arch with Linux 6.3.8 and GNOME 44.2

All the ones I'm using right now are:

  • AppIndicator and KStatusNotifierItem Support
  • Blur my Shell
  • Dash to Dock
  • Overview background
  • Pano clipboard manager
  • Material You Color Theming
  • Night Theme Switcher
  • Rounded Window Corners
  • Transparent Window Moving

I'm using Material You color theming to get colors from my dark and light wallpapers, but you can also use Gradience with adw-gtk3 for a more manual approach.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm definitely going to be digging into this list. Bookmarked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • Workspace Switch Wraparound

  • Clipboard Indicator

  • Date Menu Formatter

  • AppIndicator and KStatusNotifierItem Support

  • Auto Move Windows

  • User Themes

  • windowNavigator

  • Workspace Indicator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
  • Alphabetical App Grid
  • Clipboard indicator
  • GSConnect
  • gTile
  • Tray Icons: Reloaded
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Only AppIndicator and KStatusNotifierItem Support. Mostly because wine apps and games tend to open a floating systray if it isn't there. Other than that, i'm down to no other extensions. I found that most other stuff i changed/added either sounded nice or looked nice in screenshots but did nothing for me in day to day use. Don't get me wrong. Blur my Shell, Burn my Windows or Dash to Dock all look great. I just found that, after the initial wow factor, they don't do much for me. The effect wears of quickly and then i don't notice wether they are there or not.

load more comments
view more: next ›