this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
73 points (98.7% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5237 readers
66 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Call me pessimistic, but I assume the reasons are entirely economic, and one or all of the below apply, unless proven otherwise:

a) the areas are not productive, or are projected to be, so are being abandoned

b) they'll fell 200+k hectares of more productive forest to compensate

c) a reduction in palm sugar utilization has crashed the price, forcing them to reduce production to stay profitable.

Never believe some capitalist, or the governments they own, does anything for altruistic purposes... It's always about profit — any justification to the contrary is spin.

Edit: just read the story. 200k is one years worth of deforestation at the current rate, and only like 1.1% of existing palm oil plantations. May be good, but generally inconsequential.

[–] Zoboomafoo 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, either Indonesia fixes every square meter of deforestation at once or they're actually not helping the environment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Makes for a great headline, but will it come to fruition without some bait and switch?