this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
19 points (88.0% liked)

Leftism

2184 readers
41 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fighting Billionaires’ Control of the Media, Individual News Vouchers

https://cepr.net/fighting-billionaires-control-of-the-media-individual-news-vouchers/

@leftism

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool I'll just take my $50 voucher and give it to the Onion or trade it for a meal at 5 guys.

/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To avoid this, the voucher can be tied to a person and the party they give the voucher to can be secret and unprovable (kind of like how voting works)

[–] orrk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see where you are coming from, and I see the possibility for these vouchers to reduce the stranglehold on media, but I fear you will still just get news media going more into radicalization, EG: it would be in the best interest of groups like infowars to really get unhinged because are you going to trust those virgin blood bathing, mind controlling, new world order lizard people.

I would consider looking at something more akin to the German media tax, or just make it like 0.5%incomtax that get's put into the "media pot" and media institutions are paid by a set scale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are ways of solving such problems when they arise. We could take some elements from quadratic funding and allow people to make negative contributions to media sources they distrust as well as positive contributions to media sources they trust.

The German system sounds like the government gets to decide which organizations are considered media institutions, which sounds problematic

[–] orrk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well in the German system it's independent of the government, but honestly, populism is still worse, because you will get the same radicalizing pressures, but with "negative contributions" you now turned media into a winner take propaganda institution, ironically making the "manufactured consent" truth

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by winner take propaganda institution?

[–] orrk 1 points 1 year ago

if you allow people to "contribute negatively" then the largest unified block can and will out "negatively spend" other blocks, driving said "oppositional media" out of business.