this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Ghazi

698 readers
79 users here now

A community for progressive issues, social justice and LGBT+ causes in media, gaming, entertainment and tech.

Official replacement for Reddit's r/GamerGhazi

Content should be articles, video essays, podcasts about topics relevant to the forum. No memes, single images or tweets/toots/... please!

Community rules:

Be respectful and civil with each other. Don't be a jerk. There is a real human being on the other side of your screen. See also the Blahaj.Zone Community Rules

No bigotry of any kind allowed. Making racist, sexist, trans-/homo-/queerphobic, otherwise demeaning and hateful comments is not ok. Disabilities and mental illnesses are not to be used as insults and should not be part of your comment unless speaking of your own or absolutely relevant.

No gatekeeping and being rude to people who don't agree with you. Leave “gamer” stereotypes out of your comment (e.g. sexless, neck bearded, teenaged, basement-dwelling, etc). Don't compare people to animals, or otherwise deny their humanity. Even if you think someone is the worst human on the planet, do not wish death or harm upon them.

No "justice porn". Posts regarding legal action and similar is allowed, but celebrating someone being harmed is not.

Contrarianism for its own sake is unnecessary and not welcome.

No planning operations, no brigading, no doxxing or similar activities allowed.

Absolutely no defense of GamerGate and other right-wing harassment campaigns, no TERFs and transphobia, racism, dismissing of war crimes and praise of fascists. This includes “JAQing off”, intentionally asking leading questions while pretending to be a neutral party. This also applies to other forms of authoritarianism and authoritarian or criminal actions by liberal or leftist governments.

NSFW threads, such as ones discussing erotic art, pornography and sex work, must be tagged as such.

Moderators can take action even if none of the rules above are broken.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rest of World analyzed 3,000 AI images to see how image generators visualize different countries and cultures.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I am glad that somebody is writing about this, because this is phenomenon is - to an extent - US tech hegemony made manifest.

The US has an outsized influence over the internet, due to its tech giant's dominance over all platforms. There is an inherent bias towards the US' general public in regards to what these platforms do and who their owners consider to be their target audience. New platforms are in English, launch in the US first and adhere to US laws (which they consider to be applicable worldwide). So US users flock to it and its their worldview which inevitably dominates the discourse, whether that is in writing or in stored pictures.

The AIs only reproduce these biases, because they work with the data that these US-centric platforms attract.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another interesting experiment, which I did not intend to perform, involved me researching some style ideas using the new Stability XL.

It's pretty cool, for someone like me who has a difficulty envisioning individual clothing pieces into a whole outfit that expresses my identity.

At first it was fun to see all the combinations it generated, and all beautiful women I would certainly want to look like.

But what I noticed, certain features dominated the results. The portraits are all thin, flawless skin, models like perfect dolls. Strong profiles, perfectly proportioned noses and lips. I mean, yes if I spend 5 hrs with a professional makeup artist, maybe my face will look this way. But every day?!

So I tried to refine the results. How about a natural look, with no or minimal makeup? An average looking person, but with great style and fashion sense. It was actually really difficult to make that happen. I still haven't found a fully satisfying outcome. It seems that style and beauty imply perfection, but when I'm out seeing real women, their imperfections are the charm.

And suddenly it hit home that the AI is reflecting the pressures on all of us, especially women, to meet unrealistic standards of beauty. Rather than working with who we are and what we have, and being confident in that.

I didn't want or need perfection, but that is what it showed me. Chasing after that will cause me so much frustration and disappointment.