this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
70 points (86.5% liked)

Greentext

4105 readers
1809 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They don't.

The classic work is in the public domain. There's no longer any copyright protection on it. Publishing the classic work does take a little effort though. There's the effort of reformatting it for modern book sizes, making sure the line and paragraph breaks look good, etc. Then there are other costs like promotion and distribution. If they do that and publish it like that, nothing in their version is copyrighted either. Someone can duplicate the book exactly and sell copies, and there's nothing the publisher can do.

But, if they put in Dr. Professor Bethany Hernandez-Leslie's foreword, that part is a new work, and has a new copyright. Now if someone duplicates the book, they'll be violating the copyright not on the original work, but on Bethany Hernandez-Leslie's section.

It's the same reason that every web site with a cooking recipe has a 10-page essay on how the author's grandmother came up with the recipe. Nobody cares about that stuff, but recipes can't be copyrighted, but the other blob of text can. If someone crops out the other text and just copies the recipe, it's still possible that they could be sued for copyright infringement because it could be argued that the recipe is part of the bigger copyrighted work.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is why we can't have nice things

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

This is why we have internet archive

[–] Cruxifux 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Omfg are you serious? That recipe story bullshit is because of capitalistic enshittification?!?

God we should just do away with money entirely. At this point I’d be happier with a punch based monetary system.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

That's a minor reason. The bigger reason is that a lot of food bloggers are bloggers and just posting recipes is super boring. So they write their stories because that's what they actually want to share.

And even from a professional standpoint the Google Search Algorithm played a bigger role. Google rewards more unique content, so a story would do better than just a recipe.

And the story still doesn't protect the recipe itself. You just can't have people using a web scrapper to copy paste your entire content. But you can take the exact same recipe and add it manually into your cook book. You just have to go through the minimum effort of rewriting the steps.

[–] Brazzburry 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But my arms are so frail. I'd be so poor still.

[–] totallynotarobot 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like… fisticuffs, or kool-ade?

[–] Dellyjonut 3 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Wow mind blown.

[–] bobby_hill 4 points 11 months ago