If you decide not to go the BSD route, you should look into Void Linux. The maintainers used to be BSD people and they have carried some of that influence into Void.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
Honestly, if you want to try it to tinker, it's awesome, but you will need to compile from source a lot, and troubleshooting is harder without the big community. This makes it a bit impractical for a daily driver
It's very similar to using linux in the 2000's
I use it for desktops and servers. It's rock solid, small (compared to Linux) and performant.
I wouldn't use it if you like to run windows games or software, and sometimes hardware support can be sketchy. I've been lucky.
Try it out.
I wouldn’t want it for GUI use. As a headless server it’s amazing.
Why not? OpenBSD on a Thinkpad was a very good experience until I needed bluetooth and some other things not supported at the time. Maybe not as fast as the more optimized Linux distros but good enough for me, and more things Just Worked than with most Linux distros I tried on the same machine.
I tried, I really tried with both OpenBSD and FreeBSD, on a T420 and an X201 several years ago. It was just not equivalent to a (then) modern linux distribution for GUI use. Love both distros too. Just not for GUI.