Science

1224 readers

5 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago

New studies bolster theory coronavirus emerged from the wild (apnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Two new studies provide more evidence that the coronavirus pandemic originated in a Wuhan, China market where live animals were sold – further bolstering the theory that the virus emerged in the wild rather than escaping from a Chinese lab.

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why could it not have been both? A lab leak that spread at the market. Sure, this says initial cases were near the market, but it still doesn't say conclusively what the origin was.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

highest density of cases was both extremely near to and very centered on this market

If these findings are true it would require the lab leak to have spread to the market and not really anywhere else, which is a fair bit less likely than originating from the market.
It's possible, but when you hear hoofbeats, think horses not zebras.

[+] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conclusively?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So "conclusively" that one of the scientists in question denies that he was even sick at all in the alleged timeframe, let alone sick with Covid:

https://www.science.org/content/article/ridiculous-says-chinese-scientist-accused-being-pandemic-s-patient-zero

I fucking hate that Matt Taibbi fell so far.

Also, one of these new studies shows the early outbreak clustered around the Wuhan wet market, not the Virology Institute, which directly contradicts Taibbi & co's assertion that "patient zero" was part of the lab.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

@a-man-from-earth Did you read the article? The evidence cited there seems more compelling to me than the suspicious-but-circumstantial evidence that supports a lab leak; cases statistically clustered around the part of the wet market that sold the suspect animals, and genetic similarity to a bat strain of covid.

Still, it's possible, I just no longer believe it's probable. This quote from the article sums it up:

“Have we disproven the lab leak theory? No, we have not,” Andersen said. “But I think what’s really important here is there are possible scenarios and there are plausible scenarios and it’s really important to understand that possible does not mean equally likely.” ...

“Both of these two studies really provide compelling evidence for the natural origin hypothesis,” said Aliota, who wasn’t involved in either study. Since sampling an animal that was at the market is impossible, “this is maybe as close to a smoking gun as you could get.”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, those well known scientists with absolutely no agenda.

Come the fuck on, this is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

he really said nah, didnt elaborate and hit us with Matt Taibbi
e: y'all mad but now I'm the only one to archive it, for the record, he linked to this saying that it's conclusively proven to be a lab leak, specifically saying "Nah," to OP's link without elaborating how one was more valid than the other or anything

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you read the recent studies that this article mentions? Did you even read this article?

Or have you made up your mind based on a single statement made by 3 dudes without peer review, and no amount of peer-reviewed scientific facts and evidence will tell you otherwise?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yup. That’s just how people can be. If presented with statements they consider plausible regardless of accuracy and fits a narrative they would rather believe, it is nearly impossible to change someones mind with fact. Cognitive dissonance is powerful tool that can be exploited by wanting groups to believe the “other side” must be some great evil fighting against them to make their lives worse. When marinated in that for your entire life it becomes easy to believe just about anything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm not trusting right wing talking heads like Taibbi on anything, nevermind science and specifically covid

load more comments