Regulatory frameworks 2. Because it is early in the development of digital assets and blockchain, we recommend that the Government and regulatory agencies proceed carefully and do not design and implement a fully integrated and consistent regulatory framework for digital assets at this point in time.

Primary regulator role 8. We recommend that there should be no primary regulator for digital assets, as digital assets cover a spectrum of use cases, well beyond investment.

“Blockchain-sprints” 11. We recommend that the Digital Assets Cross-Agency Working Group hold “blockchain-sprint” equivalent or similar events to develop new ideas and strategies for industry growth.

Education 14. We recommend that secondary and tertiary educational institutions consider developing courses in relation to digital assets, blockchain, and the broader Web3 context, as part of a wider focus on technology (and its place in New Zealand’s future).

Central bank digital currency 22. We recommend that the Reserve Bank continue with design work on its central bank digital currency.

Interesting things here. Clearly the recommendation is for the government to embrace and encourage Blockchain technology, and not to regulate it too heavily.

I'm curious to see what comes of this.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] themusicman 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is... depressing.

Ask any other software professional and you'll get the same answer: Blockchain offers very little actual utility over existing techniques, and comes with a raft of new problems.

All the info is public. Forget having any privacy for your transactions - once it's on the blockchain, it's there forever visible to everyone.

There's no appeal process. Granny got scammed into sending all her money? Too bad. It's gone forever.

Right now it's almost exclusively used for scams, pyramid schemes and illegal transactions.

There is no legal use case which cannot be met and improved on with existing web2 technology.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Privacy in blockchain is a (mostly) solved problem with entire privacy chains (eg Monero) where it's absolutely impossible to track transactions, and multiple updates to Bitcoin have happened over the years to make privacy easier.

If a scammer tricks your granny out of cash, it's lost in the same way. Reversable transactions are a feature of banks, which have custody of your funds. Custodial solutions exist for blockchain assets too (though it mostly defeats the purpose).

There are plenty of benefits of blockchain, decentralisation is a huge one.

Crypto bros and trying to force adoption in stupid ways (eg NFTs) are annoying as hell though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You've pretty much made all the points I wanted to, so I'd just like to add another couple of uses for Blockchain tech:

Smart contracts. You can design smart contracts that run on protocols such as Ethereum that are completely hands off once signed.
Completely transparent tracking of data or physical goods, or provenance of physical objects. This is the best use-case for NFTs. Imagine buying a piece of art and being able to check the complete purchase and sale record of that artwork.
Decentralized digital fiat currency. There is nothing stopping this from being a reality. Tx fees are set to encourage miners/nodes, but if a digital currency is run by a central bank this is not required as the nodes could be run by them. Imagine fee-free transactions as easy as any crypto, but it being identical to fiat currency.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Goddammit block chain is not web3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't think it was either, so I did a quick search to find a definition, only to discover that it kind of is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it is because blockchain people coined the term web3 to try convince people crypto was the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it was coined by one of the Ethereum founders. But, I mean. That's what it means right? It has no other meaning...

I'd also point out it includes cryptocurrency but extends to all use cases of Blockchain technology, which goes far beyond it's use as a digital currency.