this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
9 points (69.6% liked)

World News

38748 readers
2492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] staint 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not convinced that our world needs more human beings.

[–] taj 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither am I. But, the problems that are, and will be created by falling birth rates and a smaller population overall, are real too. That can't be denied.

Now, are they unsurmountable? No. Should they be talked about? Yes. Locally, the high/middle school was over built just a few years ago. It's already clear it's far bigger than we need now, or are likely to need for many, many, many years - maybe ever. (Our 'average class' size has fallen from ~200 to barely 120-30, at best... In just a few years. With no signs of ever improving.)

[–] staint 2 points 1 year ago

When does it end, though? How many human beings can this earth support? At what cost of natural resources, flora/fauna, environmental harm?

AI is increasingly taking over jobs that previously required humans. How many humans are actually needed to support current populations? How many of these now-displaced humans will enjoy enough resources to sustain themselves while increasing humanity's knowledge base, artistic pursuits and general intellectual/emotional enlightenment?

These are not rhetorical questions. I don't know the answer to these things. It seems to me that increased population for the sake of population growth itself is not correct.

[–] soul4rent 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On situations like Japan, there seems to be a trend of income and purchasing power with having children. If people want children, but can't afford them... They won't have them.

You can see a higher percentage of wealthy people having children vs a lower percentage of working poor people having children everywhere. The only way to increase childbirths naturally is to make working affordable to support them.

[–] WillardHerman 4 points 1 year ago

I find this difficult to mourn. Less consciousness, less sentience means less nightmare.

[–] Crackhappy 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sabbah 2 points 1 year ago

Replaced link