this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
1263 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

11717 readers
4 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't believe that I have to post this, but AI kiddie stuff is still kiddie stuff. It may or may not be illegal where you live, but it is not OK to post on this instance and we will ban you with extreme prejudice. Thank you.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alynnetjes 136 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard agree. Though I do have a question I imagine these are people with desires(wrong or bad), but a human drive none the less. Acting on that is wrong I fully agree. However if we keep calling them crepes and idiots and other names like this. People who have these desires and realize they are problematic, where can they go? We are literally pushing them away without giving them an option to redeem.

The reason i put this here is because creating this stigma will make more people more desperate, making in turn more kiddie stuff.

For anyone reading this, go to a counselor, a trusted gp, a psychiatrist who doesn't judge. Do not act on these desires, but find help to talk about them.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago

Yup. Fundamentally, being attracted to children isn't any different from a foot fetish. They can't change how their brain is wired, and they're not monsters for feeling that way. They should absolutely be able to seek help without concern.

And, while I believe the AI gen stuff is disgusting, if it prevents a real child from being abused... Idk, it's a super nuanced issue.

Now, that all changes if they start trying to act on those feelings.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago

Good! No place for sexual children pics, child or otherwise.

[–] just_another_person 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Them: "But it's not even real"

Us: "The intent is though, you fucking creep."

Them: "There's nothing illegal about it."

Us: "HOW ARE YOU NOT GETTING THE FUCKING POINT HERE?"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

The classic legality is not morality conundrum

[–] teruma 13 points 1 year ago

no its ok c she's 1000 yr old spirit trapped in a child's body its totally different 🤢

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@just_another_person @MikeyMongol they NEVER respond to any point. That is how you detect them. They don’t talk. They state. They ignore response beyond “what about …?” Or otherwise changing the subject. They do not discuss. They disturb their victims hoping for an unsettled soul who might turn to their side. I have had to unfriend a lot of people because this is below they behave.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

Already 419 upvotes, and counting. Glad to see that the instance, not only the mods but also the users, stand against that shit.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Ngl when I started reading this I didn’t look at the community, and thought this was going into tax benefits for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i feel icky just reading this comment section

[–] new_acct_who_dis 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What are you seeing? I only see people happy with this, and one idiot making a comment about Loli

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FrankTheHealer 3 points 1 year ago
[–] new_acct_who_dis 14 points 1 year ago

Wow, pretty happy I haven't been on Lemmy for a few weeks. Thanks for cracking down on that garbage

[–] AngryCommieKender 12 points 1 year ago

Took me a minute to figure out that you weren't talking about denying content to immature AI models, lol. I may need some food.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago