this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

17453 readers
178 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If true, I’m not surprised since they released FC Pro on the iPad. Since the Vision Pro uses the same M2 chip as the iPad Pro, it makes sense.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Xcode on this thing could be amazing. Imagine having a live preview a visionOS app while editing it in a window right next to it.

[–] LJay71 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This actually never crossed my mind that FCP could also be a native app for Vision Pro. I was only thinking it would be available using it as a display for Mac. Cant wait to see it in action now!

[–] happy_chappie 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Although I’d prob be more than happy to just use the VR style display via my Mac, having a native app would probably allow for more headset functionality.

[–] berkeleyblue 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cool Idea I think but isn't that taxing on the Battery? And If I only use it at home, wouldn't I use it on another mac and just use the Vision as a Display?

[–] MichelleG 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When they talked about its uses as a computer, they pretty much implied it would be plugged in, not on battery power. I don't think Apple expects people to use FC Pro on battery power if they don't have to since it only has a 2-hour battery life. I think Final Cut will drain it quickly, as I've been using FC Pro on my iPad, and battery life suffers.

As to your second point, I know it's hard to believe, but not everyone owns a Mac (insert shocked face). If I'm going to pay $3,500, then it better be a stand-alone device. One that I don't need a Mac, iPad, or iPhone to work. For those already in the Apple ecosystem, I would probably only use it as an additional display unless the Vision FC Pro version is a complete redesign to take advantage of "Spacial Computing."

[–] berkeleyblue 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I get that, I'm just not sure that the Power of an M2, even though it is quite impressive for what it is, is really sufficient to do something in Final Cut that couldn't be done in iMovie. But maybe I'm just not in the loop right now. How good does FCP work for you on your iPad so far? What kind of projects are you doing?

[–] MichelleG 3 points 1 year ago

I was surprised how well FCP works on the iPad. For some features, it works better than the Mac version. There’s no slowness or stuttering at all. It’s easy to edit videos, and the best feature is the ability to create live drawings. I just started using it to edit 4k videos for my YouTube channel.