I am happy we didn't immediately cave in and made a 4th offer. This is already an improvement from previous years. After negotiations we might end up paying 2-3m more which I think is absolutely fine. But lets look elsewhere for now and see if Chelsea caves.
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)
Red Devils
927 readers
6 users here now
All things Manchester United.
New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.
Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!
Basic rules:
- Fuck the Glazers
- Be civil to each other
- No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
- Fuck the Glazers
- Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
- Keep it legal - no streams please :)
- Have fun!
- Fuck the Glazers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Hopefully this sets a benchmark. We've been a soft touch in the transfer market for too long
I agree, I think we need to be taking a bit more firm of a line with transfers. It's pretty rough seeing city pick up players like Haaland for £50m while we pay over the odds.
These price tags invite extra pressure and criticism and then the monster wages we put them on makes it hard to shift players, especially if they've been seen to be playing like shit for a couple seasons.
Give up on Mount and get Nani back.
Leave it and go for Caicedo and lets fuck Chelsea up.
Full Tweet:
Understand Man United have not left the negotiations for Mason Mount — as £55m bid is still valid on the table. But not accepting Chelsea’s £65m counter offer. 🚨🔴 #MUFC
Door remains open but Man Utd will not wait forever, believing £55m is fair bid.