this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
70 points (87.2% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4671 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How old IS this shit? "The last three elections" and the graph goes to 2012? The latest date even cited is 2014, so that puts it nearly a decade behind... Opensecrets.org might want to get a few more interns and maybe move the office to a building with windows.

[–] TehBamski -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I clearly added the year the data goes to, in the title. "(2016)"

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints 2 points 1 year ago

Without data showing the developments post-Drumpf, this is pretty sus, NGL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a lot more blue on that graph now

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which graph, exactly, and where are you getting your facts?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"My" source? I'm not OP, and you made a claim without any inkling of factual basis, followed by a misdirected and overly vitriolic retort? Fuckin' tool. I asked a simple and understandable question, cupcake. Go touch grass.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Not my alt, you put a lot of faith in this nonsense poster. You postured like you believed it. If that came off as unclear to me then it's an issue with your wording.