this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
124 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43372 readers
1332 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this will vary a lot, so hypothetically let’s say you currently WFH/work remotely at least 3 days a week. Your commute to work takes an hour max (door to door) each way. If you were given the choice of a 4 day week working onsite, or a 5 day week WFH (or as many days as you’d like) for the same pay, which would you choose?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1 day doesn’t make much of a difference for me, so I’ll still take the 5 WFH days. It’s still a much better use of my time when you total all the time saved from commuting and being able to run errands/chores while WFH vs. being in the office for 4 days. 3 days though? Maybe I’ll consider it.

[–] ilovetacos 4 points 1 year ago

I've been WFH since 2020 and never going back. I moved to a location where any on-site jobs would require at least an hour commute. No thanks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First of all, thanks for the question, I think it's really interesting and I'm sorry that some people are responding with so much hostility.

If I commute 2 hours a day and work 5 days a week, that works out at 10 hours, which is more than a single day's work - so for that reason alone I think the question is a little flawed.

However, the company I used to work for was a 5 minute or so commute for me. So if I could have a short commute like that and work 4 days from the office, I'd totally go for it. More time for me! If it was even as much as 20 minute commute (4.5 days work equivelent) then I'd rather work from home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you! I’m not able to work so I can’t say with certainty which one I’d choose. I think WFH because it just seems more flexible to me - and I don’t like people, or getting up early, or commuting. And it’s better for the environment and cheaper for me. But having a 3 day weekend every weekend sounds great! I wonder if my life would have a clearer home/work balance and if that would make me happier 🤷🏼‍♀️ I was just interested in what people who do work think, I didn’t expect any hostility from such an inoffensive question!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I've got pretty severe ADHD so WFH is a mixed bag, it's great to have the flexibility but some days I dig myself a hole of not actually doing anything and putting myself under severe pressure to get stuff done in way less time than I would have, and so on. If anyone in the comments has any tips on overcoming this they would be gratefully received :D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Would you do that for a 20% pay cut?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. I work from home so that I don't have to go to the office.

  2. I don't have to go to the office.

  3. Let me work fewer days. 4x10 days would be nice. From home. So I don't have to go to the office.

  4. I don't want to go to the office just to be on Zoom all day anyway. It's a waste of time, a waste of carbon, and a waste of company money on the office space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sensing you don’t like going to the office…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

4 days on site, not even close.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe anyone would choose commute.

[–] zacher_glachl 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a 25 min commute by subway and I enjoy banter with my colleagues. Due to covid I also know that I devolve into a troglodyte on full WFH so :shrug:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They’re a definite minority but at least 3 people here chose the 4 day week.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will take Working From Home, knowing that I can get the equivalent of a day off per week anyway and I can use it mostly as I need it through the week.

I'm assuming that my employer doesn't monitor my machine to make sure my mouse pointer is moving. If that were the case, I'd have to fix that problem first.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe there are devices called "mouse jigglers" for that problem

[–] databender 1 points 1 year ago

I'm full WFH, and if I plugged one in it would be an instant firing. I don't have time any for anything but work in the day anyways, they have very high expectations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

WFH always, all the time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A lot depends on the exact conditions. If the WFH/remote work let's my live anywhere in the world, I'd take that in a heartbeat. If I still have to be in a specific country it depends on how bad the commute is. If it's 10 minute to a train station, hop on a train for 40 minutes and another 10 to the office, then I take the 4 day work week. But if the commute is driving or lots of transfering then I would go with WFH.

[–] RaoulDook 2 points 1 year ago

I have done it both ways actually and I would take the 5 days WFH because I could still do the same amount of work in both scenarios and get paid the same. And on my "extra" 5th day of WFH I can just pretend to work and do whatever anyway.

Even if I had to actually work more, I'd still do WFH instead of commuting to the office because the commute and office + city experience just suck that much more.

[–] KHTangent 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

4 days on-site. I like the mental separation by having a completely separate space for work, and I enjoy talking to my colleagues. I don't see many people outside of work, so I need the social interaction. And the lunches at work are usually much healthier than something I'd cook up myself, so that's also a plus.

I have tried to work from home a few days, but don't really like it at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I remember at the start of the first lockdown there were a bunch of young people in flat shares that really really struggled because the only private place they had to work was their bedrooms. I can definitely understand why people might like to work in the office for that reason and reasons like your own.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] neanderthal 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After doing WFH for several years, I'll only take a job on site as a last resort or for like double my pay. Then I would cut my time until FIRE roughly in half. I don't hate doing work. I hate having a huge chunk of my time taken up by having to work 40 hours.

If work weeks were cut to 24 or even 32 hours, I might even reconsider the FIRE path.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Financial Independence, Retire Early

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My comment goes against the trend, but I'd choose to go into work since I find it much easier to focus, to the point where I could likely get the same amount of work done in 4 days at the office vs 5 days at home.

Currently my employer makes us come into the office three days per week, unless we choose to switch to full-time remote.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›