this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
274 points (96.9% liked)

Apple

17543 readers
79 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] malloc 137 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would be nice if companies can spin up their own (lemmy|mastodon|...) instances and push out releases there. No more "blue check marks" to verify authenticity or relying on the platform to be stable. If it comes from @public.apple.com, then it's guaranteed to be authentic.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it’s good enough for the BBC and the German government, then it’s good enough for large corporations.

Plus, there was just a post earlier today where someone was showing X/Twitter was asking for $1000 a month to verify their business account. Why would Apple ever pay that?

[–] affiliate 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because to them $1000/mo is the equivalent of paying a subscription with your pocket lint

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They still wouldn't pay it if they can find a way around it.

[–] affiliate 3 points 1 year ago

i agree that apple probably doesnt want to throw $1k/mo into the trash, but if you were to take a detailed look at all of the money apple spends each month, you would likely find a lot of waste that is harder to justify than having a verified presence on twitter. not saying i agree with them hypothetically spending $1k/mo on twitter, but if you're running a multinational corporation that pulls in almost $400 billion a year, you most likely wouldn't care too much about where 0.000003% of your annual revenue is going.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Also they can additionally see subdomain accounts as a verification service.

The point of Twitter was they didn't have to do it themselves tho. Company websites weren't a thing back in the past bur became one for the same reason they later got Twitter. The suggestion of self hosting is, in a way, somewhat of a step back. But they SHOULD be doing it.

[–] greendakota99 39 points 1 year ago

This is a clickbait headline. The full information is: “Apple is planning to eliminate social media support advisor roles across Twitter, YouTube, and the Apple Support Community website…”

The headline is expecting people to click to read what Twitter and YouTube did to piss off big daddy Apple however they are also eliminating their own community website.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the fact that they have an iMessage endpoint dedicated to support should be enough, on top of the on-site and in-person options.

If you’ve got a device to ask for support on YouTube or Twixxer, you’ve got a device that can at the very least open up a chat on their site. If not connect directly within iMessage.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] bigdog_00 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually this is pretty wild to me, when did this come about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It says it was created Jan. 10th 2023

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

What's Twitter?

Let me ask my fellow X-Reys... Dang, it's down.