this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1620 readers
71 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

kinda glad I bounced off of the suckless ecosystem when I realized how much their config mechanism (C header files and a recompile cycle) fucking sucked

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nazi nonsense aside,

when I realized how much their config mechanism (C header files and a recompile cycle) fucking sucked

That's the thing here: It REALLY sucks. Which sucks for a project that calls itself "suckless".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I dunno. I'll be the odd one out and say that I fuckin love it. I'm a systems programmer though, so maybe that skews my opinion.

I use dwm and st regularly but with this new news, I'm disappointed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Gave up on st in favour of alacritty after realizing I deserve nice things like clickable links and scrolling without maintaining a dependency hell of patches.

I think they toned down the nazi shit around the time when my tolerance for that brand of edginess began to dip towards the crust punk bartender's level, so I've given them a huge benefit of doubt.

I somehow didn't remember them doing a mock Charlottesville, though. I'm disappointed but at this point not too surprised.

Thankfully my desire for a community of software minimalist C curmudgeons and Unix nerds is adequately fulfilled by friends IRL whom I know for sure not to be fascist assholes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just as an aside, I know it's probably meant to be pronounced "suck-LESS", but I think it's funnier to pronounce it "SUCK-less".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

:( sadness. I'm pathologically opposed to software complexity (I mean pathologically, it hurts me) and have a really nice rice set up with dwm.

GNOME's new mosaic layout project which is a few years down the pipeline looks like it might solve the problem of tiling vs teenager's desk windows management so maybe I should switch.

I actually do like the patching thing, prefer it to xmonad which needs recompiling every day that ends in Y or i3 which is about as fun to configure as fellating one of those tubular cheese graters.

Taking suggestions on fast minimalist launchers and windows managers tiling ideally (and terminals with Unicode support rxvt suuuuuuuuuuucks) if anyone has them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been happy with awesomewm for years now. Maybe one day I'll enshrine my current config in dwm or something from scratch in Rust and XCB, but so far it has not been the time.

As for terminal emulators, alacritty has been comfy for me. It's not the most minimalist thing out there but whatever promises it makes in relative complexity, it delivers in performance and features.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh hey, i love awesomewm! i'm much less amenable to fiddling with annoying linux config than I used to be, but the lua-scriptability is just appealing enough that I don't mind messing with it a bit to do silly things

I just use xfce4-terminal though lol

sidenote, I went to edit this post and accidentally deleted it instead. Would it be so hard for lemmy to use words instead of a million cryptic icons....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I just lost a long post cause upvoting the post you’re replying to causes lemmy to remove the reply box, losing its contents, without any confirmation. lemmy sure is an approach to a UI

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh hey, i love awesomewm! i'm much less amenable to fiddling with annoying linux config than I used to be, but the lua-scriptability is just appealing enough that I don't mind messing with it a bit to do silly things

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the one nice thing is that the suckless ecosystem’s simplicity means that forking these things should be fairly easy for a dev or group with the time and spoons to handle maintenance, and might even provide a new direction for features that suckless would never consider

Taking suggestions on fast minimalist launchers and windows managers tiling ideally (and terminals with Unicode support rxvt suuuuuuuuuuucks) if anyone has them.

unfortunately, the only thing I use is emacs (exwm as a tiling window manager, emacs itself as a process launcher, vterm for a mostly not terrible somewhat high performance terminal, a pile of Lisp that keeps growing as I patch things live, all tied into the system with a bunch of Nix)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TIL about exwm, seems fun!

(I'm bitextual, I use both emacs and vim, though I'm more on the vim side of the scale)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Emacs was the best os except for the text editor until you could run vim on it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

oh I am also bitextual as fuck (I’m immediately stealing this) so I highly recommend running exwm under Doom Emacs or Spacemacs, both of which have modules for it (and you can also do a fully custom minimal evil layer for it by just importing exwm from elpa and writing a little bit of config, which I prefer)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, you started learning org mode didn't you?

You've seen this yeah? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urcL86UpqZc

has me in stitches. Browsing Wikipedia from within emacs is so convenient though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What is mac?

What a poser. What self-respecting Emacs fanatic doesn't know about Project MAC?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Or I would accept trying something a bit chubby if people have reasons to recommend it. Like sure it slows down the hellbox but it detects when your concentration is flagging and makes you a coffee type shit. Just no transparency effects, Jesus fuck I hate transparency effects. It's like "hey want to spend more power rendering something that's harder to parse visually?" umm no? who wants that? why would you want that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Years ago I wrote a patch for st but never submitted it because there was just something off about their website and I didn't want to deal with them. Guess my gut was right lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There was some remarkably juicy drama i saw on suckless personal pages (mostly manifestos) once but hell if I can find it now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're cryptofascists. Here is my favorite example; note that he replies to everybody else but not directly to me, because he is a coward.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

they seem to be particularly bad at the crypto part — their posts reek like nazi, and they use all the standard fash “debate” tactics (including ignoring anything too difficult to reply to, as you’ve pointed out)