I'm really looking forward to a new company establishing its reputation on this incredible glass, only to quietly replace it with cheaper and worse glass years later.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)
Science
1224 readers
5 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.
founded 2 years ago
let's hope that's not the case. there are reputable glassmakers already that pride themselves on the quality of their products.
I don't think the glass makers themselves are necessarily the issue - they'll supply whatever is in demand, including low quality crap if demand is high enough.
People know brand names. People don't own glass testing equipment. People will buy cheap glass for a high price if it has a brand name they associate with quality.
Supply and demand has nothing to do with it.
The existence of quality makers implies there is sufficient demand for quality
ah, the transparent aluminum from Star Trek
Came here looking for this, thank you. ☺
Oh cool, looks like Kbin supports gif thumbnails now!
It always has actually!
I'd get excited but I feel like every time I read about something like this we never see it actually used in practical application.
This announcement is: We have managed to do this for a small sample in a lab using specialised equipment, likely taking days to produce one test item.
That is a long, long way from: We have scaled this up to a automated process that produces thousands of identical sheets of glass per day that will cover tens of thousands of phones.
The scientists have proved it is possible, there are now another 100 steps for the engineers it work through to see if it can scale economically.
...and with those steps are even more potential points of failure. This is why we shouldn't get too excited.
It's promising and I hope it works out, but we should temper our expectations.
Sounds like it exchanges rigidity for plasticity but it doesn't have long term durability (once you damage the paracrystilline areas, they lose that property). Better than directional crystalline structures because there's not a "grain", but weaker.
The researchers explain the extraordinary strengthening of the glass by the fact that forces acting on the glass from outside, which would normally lead to breakage or internal cracks, are now primarily directed against the paracrystalline structures. They dissolve areas of these structures and transform them back into an amorphous, random state.
If I'm reading this correctly, hitting the glass multiple times will make it as brittle as glass over time.
oh cool, so the glass on phone screens will become ~~tougher~~ thinner?
~~tougher~~ ~~thinner~~
pricier
So we finally have chainglass?
Is this how we herald the arrival of the prador?
I for one welcome our new terrible carnivorous crab overlords