this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Gunners

1516 readers
10 users here now

Victoria Concordia Crescit

We are a community for supporters of the North London-based football club Arsenal F.C.

Sister Community: https://lemmy.world/c/arsenalwfc

Join our FPL with League Code: tt2t8e

If old posts remain pinned on other instances, comment on the Daily Discussion with a screenshot!

Transfer Reliability Guide

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Matt_Sams_314 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess we'll have to find a way to get on board with this - I trust Eduteta but this seems like a bad buy at a really bad price.

[–] Astrealix 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eh, the buy I don't think is that bad

the price though... why are we bailing out our local rivals?

[–] Matt_Sams_314 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't understand how he's a priority vs other positions and then yes, giving Chelsea any money, let alone that much when it allows them to meet FFP and also buy players that we want seems like a horrific plan.

[–] Astrealix 1 points 2 years ago

I think he's looked at as a Xhaka upgrade rather than as a 9, which would make sense both on why we cooled on Caicedo and why we want him when Balogun and Eddie exist. Personally think he'd be good in any of our front 5 spots except LW, and we need another backup for Saka even if Nelson extends. The Chelsea bit is my main problem with it, but if it works out I won't protest too much.

[–] sensiblepuffin 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This might be hopium, but maybe a lot of that is bonuses. For example, 45+15 I think would be a lot more reasonable if the clauses aren't a formality, and I think most of us wouldn't be too angry about that.

[–] Astrealix 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reports are 55+10 iirc, which feels like a bit much

[–] sensiblepuffin 2 points 2 years ago

Goddammit. Well hopefully it's spread out over fifty five years.