this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1249 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SignullGone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is interesting that despite something purportedly falling off the object after being struck by an AIM missile, the object continued its trajectory. This information also brings to mind the video posted by an individual showing lengthy clips of Blackhawks and a C-130 circling in search of something in a remote area. This is particularly noteworthy considering the NORAD General's statement that the weather conditions were too adverse for a search operation.

[–] HM05_Me 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that one lingers on my mind. The whole series of events starting with the Chinese spy balloon was strange, even if just from how they handled it and addressed with the public. But, they then engaged with additional objects and remained cryptic to the public. Add to it the fact that these additional ones were found after adjusting their radars. There's no telling how many other objects were previously ignored and perhaps continue to be. Citing from a Wikipedia page on high-altitude object events of 2023:

General Glen VanHerck, the commander of NORAD, said that in 2021, up to 98% of raw radar data was not routinely analyzed, because the military aimed to filter out radio signal emanating from flocks of birds or weather balloons (as opposed to potential threats). VanHerck said that the U.S. adjustments to radar monitoring in 2023, after the Chinese spy balloon intrusion, gave the U.S. "better fidelity on seeing smaller objects."

[–] SignullGone 2 points 1 year ago

But, they then engaged with additional objects and remained cryptic to the public. Add to it the fact that these additional ones were found after adjusting their radars. There’s no telling how many other objects were previously ignored and perhaps continue to be.

You've highlighted a significant observation. It's indeed intriguing that high-definition footage from the fighter jet was readily shared when it pertained to the Chinese spy balloon, but no information or footage has been released regarding the other objects, particularly the one allegedly shot down over Alaska. Releasing some of that footage would certainly quell many of the speculations and rumors.

[–] zanzo 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I skipped to the beginning of this Q&A session and was intrigued by Rosco’s assertion that 1) he’s been told what form these NHI come in, 2) that he can’t say what that, and 3) he will soon reveal this.

Makes me wonder if this will be part of the Senate hearings and so this will free him to say more.

[–] SignullGone 2 points 1 year ago

Makes me wonder if this will be part of the Senate hearings and so this will free him to say more.

It is interesting that figures like Ross Coulthart, James Fox, Jeremy Corbell, George Knapp, and Michael Shellenberger, who all purport to have contacts "on the inside," are echoing similar sentiments. The assertion that more whistleblowers with firsthand knowledge are stepping forward. Either they are all getting fed the same lie or it's going to happen. Time will tell.