Caicedo for £115m is absolute robbery, and there's a fucking sell on clause lmao. Big kudos to Brighton for the outstanding business. Not sure if Boehly is really that clueless or is just happy to throw huge amounts of money about.
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)
Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )
5679 readers
21 users here now
Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No piracy
Other Football/Soccer Related Communities
- Eredivisie
- MLS
- Football Manager
- Ajax FC
- Arsenal FC
- Chelsea FC
- Liverpool FC
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
- US National Woman’s Soccer League
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Athletic says it's 100m fixed 15 addons with half of it being easy toa achieve and a sell-on clause what the absolute fuck, lol
Genius transfer market nous from Boehly's Boys. Could have just spent 100m two months ago when that was clearly Brighton's asking price, instead ended up with this absolute farce. It's not like this is the first time this happens either, when are people going to learn that Brighton doesn't budge?
On the other side of the coin, what a gift to Tony Bloom that Liverpool bid was. No idea who did the negotiating for Chelsea but they got absolutely taken to the cleaners. The sell-on clause is pure comedy.
truly reminiscent of of the genius Woodward negotiation for Fellaini, don't trigger the release clause only to end up paying more a month later.
This whole saga has been so silly
Are Chelsea banking on prices going up and up and up so they can sell for more in... Seven years?