this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

IPv6

317 readers
3 users here now

IPv6 Discussions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone messed with using the very large jumbo frames for IPv6 for anything like video transfer, or large file transfers?

I'm curious if anyone has done it for firewall overhead reduction too

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orangeboats 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Multi-GB jumbo frames? At that point you'd hit ethernet limitations rather than IP ones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True, but should still see a reduction in layer 3 fire walling overhead, no? Though at that point I see places where annoying issues could start occurring.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You'd need some special hardware with a large enough MTU to handle that. While IP itself can most hardware can't

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're right! At least from what I can tell. Heck, Linux doesn't support jumbo payloads from what I can tell, but FreeBSD [does] (https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/ipv6/#ipv6-jumbo). Reading their docs it seems the lack of hardware support is an issue for them as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For once, this quote is almost relevant:

"The Internet is not something that you just dump something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material."