Technology

35012 readers

276 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

"Workers are hiding their AI productivity hacks from bosses" (self.technology)

submitted 1 year ago by Rifal to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Wharton professor believes that businesses should motivate their employees to share their individual AI-enhanced productivity hacks, despite the prevalent practice of hiding these tactics due to corporate restrictions.

Worker's Use of AI and Secrecy:

Employees are increasingly using AI tools, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, to boost their personal productivity and manage multiple jobs.
However, due to strict corporate rules against AI use, these employees often keep their AI usage secret.

Issues with Corporate Restrictions:

Companies tend to ban AI tools because of privacy and legal worries.
These restrictions result in workers being reluctant to share their AI-driven productivity improvements, fearing potential penalties.
Despite the bans, employees often find ways to circumvent these rules, like using their personal devices to access AI tools.

Proposed Incentives for Disclosure:

The Wharton professor suggests that companies should incentivize employees to disclose their uses of AI.
Proposed incentives could include shorter workdays, making the trade-off beneficial for both employees and the organization.

Anticipated Impact of AI:

Generative AI is projected to significantly transform the labor market, particularly affecting white-collar and college-educated workers.
As per a Goldman Sachs analysis, this technology could potentially affect 300 million full-time jobs and significantly boost global labor productivity.

Source (Business Insider)

PS: I run a ML-powered news aggregator that summarizes with an AI the best tech news from 50+ media (TheVerge, TechCrunch…). If you liked this analysis, you’ll love the content you’ll receive from this tool!

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Protoknuckles 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the big problem is that if you find a way to automate your work or make it more efficient, your reward is more likely to be more work at the same pay, or even being replaced with AI tools and a new hire. You are incentivized to lie about it and pretend you are working.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are efficient at your job you will be rewarded with more work.

[–] Mereo 2 points 1 year ago

Indeed, it is a vicious circle. You will be rewarded with more work so you'll use chatGPT to help you with that work. You'll then be regarded with more work...

[–] stormageddon 7 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, we've learned that bosses will often exploit those shortcuts to just pile endless amounts of mind-numbing tasks on us.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

What a dumb article. Two major points are missing:

If the employee shares their tricks the company will just fire them. Then replace them with the scripts / AI. Or simply hire someone for far cheaper who starts those scripts once a day..
Companies don't want you to use AI because you're leaking company secrets. If you pump things into ChatGPT they are logged and might be re-used. So if I put my company numbers in there or private info or whatever else they will get leaked sooner or later. It's a massive security issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have an anecdote of an opposite trend -- maybe not common, but I thought perhaps interesting.

I recently interacted with a CEO and all of his (long) feedback on a proposal was fully chatGPT generated responses to my questions. While arguably they could produce a higher quality response by sitting down and working (because I know I could have), the quality of the interaction was acceptable and it contained one or two novel and applicable ideas.

So I'm looking at the graphics design work that gets done at the company, and while I can certainly see the path to doing it 100% with AI, that would require a significant amount of capital to develop reliably. I could just put that money in the bank, and pay the current team indefinitely off the interest. So their jobs are quite safe for now!

On the other hand, one thing I've considered doing is hiring someone to be my boss. I own the company, and am good at engineering, but that doesn't magically make me also good at managing my time and that of other staff. I'm looking at the responses I got from that other CEO via ChatGPT, and suspect that it would be an acceptable tool in my case. So I am literally considering 'hiring' ChatGPT as an executive in my company -- although obviously I have to take what it over-confidently says with a grain of salt, but that's consistently been a recurring problem with human executives I've worked with too.