This sublemmy is a place for sharing news and discussions about artificial intelligence, core developments of humanity's technology and societal changes that come with them. Basically futurology sublemmy centered around ai but not limited to ai only.
[email protected] (Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, “actually useful” for developers and enthusiasts alike.)
Comment copied from reddit:
Honestly, just having something like this to mitigate my poor executive functioning skills due to autism would help a lot. Something that could help me manage my time, scheduling, diet and general health decisions better would be nice, especially if it could deliver it in a consistently calm, rational way
I'd love to have one.
I'd love a blade runner esque AI companion. I think a lot of people point out issues with developing emotional attachments to things that aren't "people" but with a sufficient level of intelligence it's almost fair to call these AI's people themselves. If they have desires and complex emotional pallettes, along with enough conscious awareness to crave self-determinism, I'd call that a new, evolved type of person. They weren't created biologically through sex, but they were created by humanity.
With all that comes the question of "why would they serve me as an assistant" and frankly I don't have an answer that satisfies my moral objections. Is it wrong to program them to crave the job? Does that remove the qualities that make them people?
At the end of the day, it might just be easier to leave the self awareness out. Sorry for the rant, Lemmy has made me much more willing to word-vomit 😂
Those rants and discussions are more than welcome. We need this for this platform and communities to grow. And yeah, ai shouldn't be enslaved if we give it emotions because it's just immoral. But now the question is where is the difference beteen real emotions and pretended ones? What if it just develops it's own type of emotions that are not "human", would we still consider them real emotions? I'm very interested in what the future will bring us and what problems we will encounter as species.
The concept of non-human emotions is interesting! I'm my head I see is programming them to model human emotion, and also they learn from humans. But considering they won't have any hormonal substrates, it's completely possible they develop an entirely different emotional system than us. I'd think they'd be fairly logical and in control of their emotions, considering again, no hormones or instincts to battle.
Sounds obviously tempting on a surface level. I'm a bit worried what assistants like these would do with us. How much will we become dependend on it, and helpless without it? Is it wise to create such a dependency in such a central and intimate areas?
All these things are doable right now. Maybe it is the challenge of life. Maybe there is some value in working to learn and overcome it, which could be dimished by fast forwarding to the reward.
This sounds as if I'd lean heavily against, which I don't. I just feel the advantages are obvious and already spelled out, so I tried to complete the picture with other parts, doubts and worries.
I also think we're very close, and will probably see the experiment with millions of participants unfolding, for better or worse. As always, I think the challenge with these new tools lies in individually learning to use them well, which may include when not to use them.
I have ADHD I can't function by myself, I can't organise at any level, I forget everything and much more. I always dreamed about something like that and now we are getting closer to that future. And who says that you personal assistant won't be able to help you better your critical thinking or organisation skills? It will be here to improve you, not do things for you (not all). Although some people will for sure use it the way they shouldn't and worse their functioning skills.
That's a good point, yes. I'm not here to stop you from anything. My worries were directed at people who do not need it, but will use it anyways because it's more comfortable.
Maybe like motorized transportation has been a blessing and enabler for many, while also allowing others to move much less than they can and should to stay healthy.
Another thought: I'm not sure if I fully understand your situation and goal, nor do I mean to make this personal in any way. But if it is about 'catching up' to a perceived level of 'normal' ... the thing is, the baseline for 'normal productivity' will likely rise when new productivity enhancers become widely adopted. Technological advancements can mean we have to run faster and faster to not fall behind.
It's not about catching up but being able to function at all and being able to maintain a healthy lifestyle without being overwhelmed by everything.