Titlegore. Who are these two radiologists this article is seemingly throwing under the bus?
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)
c/Futurology
70 readers
1 users here now
A community for the studies and speculation of how far humans can advance in technology, civilization, and humanities.
Please Observe Instance Rules:
- Do not violate any laws, third-party rights, and/or proprietary rights.
- Do not harass others, be abusive, threatening, and/or harmful.
- Do not be needlessly defamatory and/or intentionally misleading.
- Do not upload without marking obscene and/or sensitive content as such.
- Do not promote racism, bigotry, hatred, harm, and violence of any kind.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It’s just the way you do metrics for AI. You assign probabilities to the successful detection for a single doctor based on real world data e.g. one doctor will identify breast cancer correctly 90% of the time. You then assign some probability for when two doctors would consult together and successfully identify the breast cancer e.g. 95%. Then a group of doctors etc. etc.
If your AI is 96% effective then you would say it is better than two doctors.
Yes the title is a little strangely worded but in the context of the above it makes sense.