this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

Electric Cars

688 readers
22 users here now

Discussion of EVs and the technology around them

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It does suck, because everybody kind of makes fun of the Cybertruck. To the outside person, it's kind of weird, it's ugly, whatever. Once you actually get in it, drive it, you realize it's pretty frickin' cool," he says. "It's kind of been sad, because I've been trying to prove to people that it's a really awesome truck that's not falling apart, and then mine starts to fall apart, so it's just... Yeah, it's kind of unfortunate and sad."

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

TLDR Cybertruck is glued together garbage.

[–] rtxn 33 points 1 week ago

The accelerator pedal's plastic cover was also glued to the metal arm. It could easily come off and get the pedal wedged in. That dumpster is a bad fucking joke.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Glue is fine, if it's the right kind.

IIRC, the ceramic tiles were glued onto the Space Shuttle, and during re-entry it was exceeding Mach 12.

I've used structural adhesives that were stronger than the metal they held together, during stress tests the metal ripped before the adhesive failed. I believe Lotus was using adhesives on cars in the 80's, maybe 90's, because welding was problematic.

Mind, I'm not defending the monstrosity here, just clearly they chose the wrong adhesive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

IIRC, the ceramic tiles were glued onto the Space Shuttle, and during re-entry it was exceeding Mach 12.

On the other hand, they did need to be carefully inspected and some of them replaced after every trip. Some minor bits of trim maybe, but it is not okay to have the quarter panels glued on.

[–] DaddleDew 6 points 1 week ago

But then you are still supposed to be able to remove panels to perform repairs.

Who am I kidding, Teslas are the iPhone of cars. They don't give a crap about repairability.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] billwashere 2 points 6 days ago

That glue is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know a whole lot about it, but doesn't glue tend to degrade over time?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's probably that bell curve graph with the concave head and the sage monk saying "glue breaks down over time" and the crying tryhard who says "There's basically no such thing as 'glue' because we use all manner of things as adhesives that have almost nothing in common; some do break down with time or heat or vibration or moisture or light or scathing remarks, others have held furniture together for thousands of years."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So Elon decided to use one that breaks down with heat/moisture/vibration in his... Trucks?

Interesting, as they say.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

More likely than not they used the one that breaks down when exposed to scathing remarks

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Built like garbage. Looks like garbage. Belongs in the dumpster for which it also bears an uncanny resemblance.

[–] DaddleDew 14 points 1 week ago

The copium is strong with this one

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So are they going to get these trash heaps off the road, or are we going to wait for a death/maiming caused by flying metal debris on the highway?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of these pickups should be taken off the road. Tesla makes the news, but I'm not sure they are the worst offender in terms of the threat they pose to other motorists and pedestrians.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Small pickups, like the tiny B2300 I have, were regulated out of existence because emissions limits are scaled partly by square-footage. It's easier to meet emissions requirements with a giant truck than a small one so no one makes the small ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That makes no sense, but then that's what makes it more believable. Are you referring to US or Canadian regulations?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://newrepublic.com/article/180263/epa-tailpipe-emissions-loophole

long-standing special treatment for big trucks and SUVs, which exempt larger cars from more stringent emissions standards

A small pickup had to meet the same standards as a small car but a large pickup is lumped in with vehicles as large as a towtruck. So despite a small Ranger consuming less than half the fuel of an F-350, it was in a more strict emissions category. Though as per the article the EPA (however long they last) is working on fixing this issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Incredible. No one should be allowed to drive one of those things without a CDL or some other special license.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

AFAIK it was US regulations but no manufacture is going to make vehicles for just Canada when the US is 10x the market.

[–] einlander 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The ~~contents~~ comments on that's site are not kind to Tesla owners.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tesla fell off a cliff QA wise a while ago I don't know why people are surprised that it keeps getting worse when people keep buying them.

[–] SkunkWorkz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And Tesla QA was never that great to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah; even back at the release of the model S they couldn't align a body pannel to save a life. It's only gotten worse.

[–] 800XL 5 points 1 week ago

Makes ya wonder why Musk is so hellbent on getting rid of consumer protection departments in the US government.