this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
5 points (66.7% liked)

Economy

688 readers
252 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disguy_ovahea 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so incredibly wrong, it’s hilarious. They’re basing it exclusively off of standard cost of living. Older people spend far more money on healthcare in the US. I’m sure they’re also assuming the retirees are homeowners.

If you retire with $1M in NY, you’ll be lucky to make it 20 years according to the financial advisors I’ve worked with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not only is it wrong, but the premise itself is flawed. Cost of living varies widely between municipal areas, and even between neighborhoods. State level extrapolations like this are useless

[–] disguy_ovahea 2 points 1 day ago

Good point. $1M would go a lot further in Buffalo than in NYC or Westchester.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You're really telling me that if you lucked into a million dollars at age 18, you could retire to West Virginia and safely live to 107? Even ignoring inflation and the like, that's barely over $11k per year. Do you expect us to believe that's a living income anywhere in the US? That's not even a living income when you're 18 and have 3 roommates.