United States | News & Politics

2314 readers

1146 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A New Plan To Create a World Without Elon Musks. (inequality.org)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Every nation needs a maximum wealth cap. Set it at 1000x the median household income. Anything beyond that is taxed 100%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

idk i reckon 80% or something would probably end better: if the goal is to get maximum wealth for the people, chasing that last 20% will probably cause people to “donate” that 80% because they’re just that damn selfish: want to be the richest? well that’ll be $50bn/y in taxes pls, okay now FIGHT (literally if you want. here, have some knives… inheritance tax will take care of the rest)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well if you work to lift up the median wealth, their wealth can increase too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

very true!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

If billionaires were smart they would go along with this kind of non violent plan. The longer they resist, the more likely people will try more aggressive solutions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Let the hunger games begin

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

❤️Heidi❤️

[+] [email protected] -10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ah, the German crusade against wealth hoarders—how quaint. Their plan to vaporize billionaires reeks of old-world idealism, like trying to extinguish a wildfire with a teacup. History’s littered with these paper revolutions, where ink-stained manifestos crumble before the first lobbyist whispers in a minister’s ear.

Democracy’s current iteration? A glorified auction house. Power brokers and their digital feudalism platforms—LinkedIn influencers peddling hustle culture like street vendors—ensure the game stays rigged. Even if Germany slams the gates, capital’s hydra will sprunt new heads in offshore havens or crypto metaverses.

The article’s heart is in the right place, but it’s preaching to a choir that’s already left the cathedral. Propaganda mills (formerly “news networks”) will spin this as economic treason before the ink dries. Let’s see how long this fantasy lasts once the think tanks start sharpening their knives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What are you on about? Are you just here to shit on good ideas? That’s definitely not helping. And what’s with your writing style and formatting?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago

What I’m “on about” is the absurdity of pretending these so-called solutions aren’t just cosmetic surgery on a rotting corpse. Good ideas? Define “good.” If it’s more of the same neoliberal patchwork, I’ll pass. As for my style, sorry if it doesn’t fit your algorithmic attention span.

[–] ieatpwns 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’re right we should just leave everything the way it is rn. Why change?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago

Ah, the classic binary fallacy—either accept the status quo or burn it all down. Change isn’t about flipping a switch; it’s about dismantling the machinery that keeps grinding people into dust. But sure, let’s keep polishing the brass on this sinking ship, right?